The Place of Variation in Phonological Theory

Over the past 15 years, the study of variation has become increasingly important in phonology. As recently as 1995, the previous edition of this Handbook did not have a chapter on variation. In fact, the term “variation” does not even appear in its subject index. Today, any volume that attempts to give an overview of the current status of the field of theoretical phonology cannot go without a chapter dedicated to variation. In this chapter, we review how the fortunes of variation have changed over the past fifteen years, and discuss the some of the issues that arise in making a place for it in phonological theory.

[1]  Sze-Wing Tang,et al.  An integrated grammatical / non-grammatical model of phonological variation , 2009 .

[2]  John J. Ohala,et al.  There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view , 1990 .

[3]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[4]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[5]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Linguistic Optimization ∗ , 2007 .

[6]  Ulrich Ammon,et al.  Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (Project announcement) , 1984, Language in Society.

[7]  Robert Daland,et al.  Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: insights from Harmonic Grammar networks* , 2009, Phonology.

[8]  Terho Itkonen Mellakoihin vai mellakkoihin? Yleiskielemme eräiden taivutushorjuvuuksien taustaa , 1957 .

[9]  Dennis R. Preston,et al.  American dialect research , 1993 .

[10]  Mark E. Johnson,et al.  Optimality–theoretic Lexical Functional Grammar , 2002 .

[11]  Katharine Beals,et al.  The parasession on variation in linguistic theory , 1994 .

[12]  G. Jäger,et al.  The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation , 2006 .

[13]  P. T. van Reenen,et al.  Word-final t-deletion in Dutch dialects: the roles of conceptual prominence, articulatory complexity, paradigmatic properties, token frequency and geographical distribution , 1999 .

[14]  Wim Zonneveld,et al.  Constraints in Phonological Acquisition , 2009 .

[15]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[16]  William J. Hardcastle,et al.  Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: evidence from EPG and EMA data , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[17]  Gregory R. Guy Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[18]  Donca Steriade,et al.  The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: The P-Map and Its Consequences for Constraint Organization , 2008 .

[19]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates , 2006, Phonology.

[20]  Marc van Oostendorp,et al.  Style Levels in Conflict Resolution , 1997 .

[21]  Ellen M. Kaisse,et al.  On the theory of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[22]  D. R. Ladd,et al.  Phonetics in Phonology , 2011 .

[23]  Gregory R. Guy Competence, Performance, and the Generative Grammar of Variation , 1997 .

[24]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing: Formal, Computational, and Experimental Issues , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[25]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  A Faithfulness Ranking Projected from a Perceptibility Scale: The Case of [+ Voice] in Japanese , 2006 .

[26]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Does deletion of French SCHWA lead to neutralization of lexical distinctions? , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[27]  J. Hooper An introduction to natural generative phonology , 1976 .

[28]  W. Labov Locating Language in Time and Space , 1980 .

[29]  Andre Malecot,et al.  The Role of Releases in the Identification of Released Final Stops: A Series of Tape-Cutting Experiments , 1958 .

[30]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Julien Eychenne Aspects de la phonologie du schwa dans le français contemporain : optimalité, visibilité prosodique, gradience , 2006 .

[32]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Lexical Phonology and Morphology , 1982 .

[33]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  Current Approaches to Phonological Theory , 1979 .

[34]  Sharon Goldwater,et al.  Proceedings of the Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[35]  R L Diehl,et al.  Formant Transition Duration and Amplitude Rise Time as Cues to the Stop/Glide Distinction , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Corpora and exemplars in phonology , 2011 .

[37]  Robert Bayley,et al.  Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition , 2004 .

[38]  Gregory R. Guy The quantitative analysis of linguistic variation , 1993 .

[39]  G. Libben,et al.  The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives , 2007 .

[40]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[41]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  K. Stevens,et al.  Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants , 1989 .

[43]  Frans Hinskens,et al.  Dialect Levelling in Limburg: Structural and Sociolinguistic Aspects , 1999 .

[44]  J. Chambers,et al.  The handbook of language variation and change , 2003 .

[45]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[46]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation , 1992 .

[47]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[48]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[49]  K. P. Mohanan,et al.  The Theory of Lexical Phonology , 1982 .

[50]  Santa Ana A. Otto Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology , 1992, Language Variation and Change.

[51]  Arto Anttila,et al.  Variation and Phonological Theory , 2008 .

[52]  Johan Taeldeman,et al.  Fonologie en morfologie van de Nederlandse dialecten: een nieuwe materiaalverzameling en twee nieuwe atlasprojecten , 1996 .

[53]  R. Mester,et al.  The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese: Theoretical Consequences for Morphological Accessibility , 2008 .

[54]  Henrietta J. Cedergren,et al.  Variable Rules: Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence , 1974 .

[55]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Computational optimality theory , 1996 .

[56]  Gregory R. Guy Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[57]  Joe Pater Gradual Learning and Convergence , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[58]  Robert Bayley,et al.  The Quantitative Paradigm , 2013 .

[59]  Edward Flemming Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology , 2001, Phonology.

[60]  Robert Bayley,et al.  Consonant cluster reduction in Tejano English , 1994, Language Variation and Change.

[61]  A. Anttila Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations , 2002 .

[62]  A. Anttila Deriving Variation from Grammar , 1997 .

[63]  W. Labov Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English Copula. , 1969 .

[64]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  Phonological Variation and Lexical Frequency , 2008 .

[65]  R. Fasold Tense marking in black English , 1972 .

[66]  Laureen T. Lim,et al.  The Limits of Linguistic Community: Speech Styles and Variable Constraint Effects , 2005 .

[67]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  Can Connectionism Contribute to Syntax? Harmonic Grammar, with an Application ; CU-CS-485-90 , 1990 .

[68]  Joe Pater Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints , 2000, Phonology.

[69]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano , 1989 .

[70]  David Sankoff,et al.  Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods , 1978 .

[71]  Wendell Kimper,et al.  Local Optionality and Harmonic Serialism , 2008 .

[72]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Learning Phonology With Substantive Bias: An Experimental and Computational Study of Velar Palatalization , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[73]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[74]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology* , 2010, Phonology.

[75]  Jonathan Barnes,et al.  Phonetic Analogy and Schwa Deletion in French , 2002 .

[76]  John Goldsmith,et al.  The last phonological rule : reflections on constraints and derivations , 1993 .

[77]  A.C.M. Goeman T-deletie in Nederlandse dialecten. Kwantitatieve analyse van structurele, ruimtelijke en temporele varatie , 1999 .

[78]  Sarah Eisenstat Learning Underlying Forms With MaxEnt , 2009 .

[79]  P. Smolensky,et al.  The Initial and Final States: Theoretical Implications and Experimental Explorations of Richness of the Base , 2004 .

[80]  Junko Ito,et al.  Japanese Morphophonemics: Markedness and Word Structure , 2003 .

[81]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Convergence properties of a gradual learner in Harmonic Grammar , 2008 .

[82]  S. Blumstein,et al.  A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: evidence from a cross-language study. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[83]  William Labov,et al.  The child as linguistic historian , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[84]  P. Boersma How we learn variation, optionality and probalility , 1997 .

[85]  Richard M. Hogg,et al.  Phonology and Morphology , 1992 .

[86]  Andrew Nevins,et al.  Rules, Constraints, and Phonological Phenomena , 2008 .

[87]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  The nature of the schwa/zero alternation in French clitics: experimental and non-experimental evidence , 2007, Journal of French Language Studies.

[88]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .

[89]  John C. Paolillo Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods , 2001 .

[90]  Kohei Nishimura,et al.  Lyman's Law in Loanwords , 2006 .

[91]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[92]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  What it Means to be a Loser: Non-optimal Candidates in Optimality Theory , 2004 .

[93]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[94]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Some consequences of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[95]  Charles Reiss,et al.  Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar , 2007 .

[96]  B. Hayes,et al.  Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony , 2006, Phonology.

[97]  B. Hayes,et al.  Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony , 2009 .

[98]  Ys Kang,et al.  Current issues in linguistic interfaces , 2009 .

[99]  Joan L. Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[100]  Peter L. Patrick Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t,d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[101]  Frans Hinskens,et al.  Dialect levelling in Limburg : structural and sociolinguistic aspects , 1996 .

[102]  Roger K. Moore,et al.  Computing phonological generalization over real speech exemplars , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[103]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar (Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications). , 2006 .

[104]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[105]  Bernard Laks,et al.  Relire les phonologues du français: Maurice Grammont et la loi des trois consonnes , 2000 .

[106]  Gregory R. Guy,et al.  Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[107]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[108]  A. OttoSantaAna,et al.  Phonetic simplification processes in the *English of the Barrio: A cross -generational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles , 1991 .

[109]  Markus Fischer A Robbins-Monro type learning algorithm for an entropy maximizing version of stochastic Optimality Theory , 2005 .

[110]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Maximum Entropy Models and Stochastic Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[111]  B. Phillips Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion , 2006 .

[112]  SUZANNE KEMMER,et al.  The Phonology of the Lexicon : Evidence from Lexical Diffusion , 2013 .

[113]  Isabelle Racine,et al.  La production du E caduc facultatif est-elle prévisible? Un début de réponse , 2002, Journal of French Language Studies.

[114]  Young-mee Yu Cho,et al.  Variation and Change in Optimality Theory , 1998 .

[115]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  Storage and computation in the mental lexicon , 2005 .

[116]  Bert Vaux,et al.  Why the Phonological Component must be Serial and Rule‐Based 1 , 2008 .

[117]  F. Hinskens,et al.  Variation, change and phonological theory , 1997 .

[118]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  The nature of the word : studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky , 2008 .

[119]  Gunnar Ólafur Hansson,et al.  Diachronic Explanations of Sound Patterns , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[120]  Armin Mester,et al.  Covert generalizations in Optimality Theory: the role of stratal faithfulness constraints , 2001 .

[121]  W. Labov,et al.  Empirical foundations for a theory of language change , 2014 .

[122]  J. Goldsmith Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 1990 .

[123]  H. Sussman,et al.  An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization , 1991 .

[124]  Douglas C. Walker,et al.  The new stability of unstable –e in French , 1996, Journal of French Language Studies.

[125]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[126]  M. Hale,et al.  Substance Abuse and Dysfunctionalism: Current Trends in Phonology , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[127]  Bruce P. Hayes,et al.  Quatrain form in English folk verse , 1998 .

[128]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .