Reliability of repetitive dynamic strengths as a screening tool for manual lifting tasks.

Recent studies have shown that maximal dynamic strengths (MDSs) of individuals are superior and more reliable predictors of their maximum safe lifting capacity compared to maximal static strengths. The evidence, however, is based on studies that have investigated only infrequent lifting activities, i.e. lifting only a few times a day and with complete recovery from fatigue between successive lifts. It remains to be seen if MDSs are also as highly correlated to lifting capacity for frequent lifting tasks i.e. tasks that do not allow complete recovery from fatigue between successive lifts. The study reported here was conducted to determine the degree of affinity between MDSs and lifting capacities of individuals for frequent and infrequent lifting tasks. In addition, the hypothesis that lifting capacity for frequent manual lifting tasks will be more highly correlated to dynamic strength values which take into account the effect of repetition related fatigue, instead of MDSs, was tested. The results overwhelmingly supported the hypothesis. We therefore concluded that repetitive dynamic strength (RDS) is a more accurate measure of an individual's lifting capacity for frequently performed tasks, than maximal static or dynamic strengths, and deserves recognition as a reliable pre-employment screening tool for frequently performed manual lifting tasks. The experimental evidence also indicated that manual lifting tasks performed once every minute or less frequently are strength oriented while those per formed three times a minute or more frequently are not.

[1]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Ergonomics guide for the assessment of human static strength. , 1975, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  A. Mital.  Maximum weights of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended work shifts. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[3]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A computerized biomechanical model-development of and use in studying gross body actions. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A Garg,et al.  Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate. , 1979, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  A Mital.  A comparison between psychophysical and physiological approaches across low and high frequency ranges. , 1985, Journal of human ergology.

[6]  Anil Mital.  Models for predicting maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate and oxygen uptake at that weight , 1985 .

[7]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION OF HUMAN STRENGTH. , 1974 .

[8]  D. Chaffin,et al.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[9]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Use of Simulated Job Dynamic Strength (SJDS) in Screening Workers for Manual Lifting Tasks , 1985 .

[10]  A Mital,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic strength measuring device: a prototype. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Establishing an industrial strength testing program. , 1980, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  H Monod,et al.  Contractility of muscle during prolonged static and repetitive dynamic activity. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[13]  S. Snook.  The design of manual handling tasks. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[14]  D. Chaffin.  Human strength capability and low-back pain. , 1974, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[15]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Biomechanical Computerized Simulation of Human Strength in Sagittal-Plane Activities , 1972 .

[16]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS , 1978 .

[17]  M Tabor.  Reconstructing the scene: back injury. , 1982, Occupational health & safety.

[18]  K H Kroemer,et al.  Human Strength: Terminology, Measurement, and Interpretation of Data , 1970, Human factors.

[19]  J. Pytel,et al.  Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable lifting , 1981 .

[20]  Park KyungS.,et al.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Methods of Manual Load Lifting , 1974 .

[21]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Preemployment strength testing: an updated position. , 1978, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[22]  W Karwowski,et al.  Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[23]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Isometric strength testing as a means of controlling medical incidents on strenuous jobs. , 1980, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[24]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[25]  Shihab S Asfour.  Energy cost prediction models for manual lifting and lowering tasks , 1980 .

[26]  E Kamon,et al.  Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers. , 1982, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.