An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed's growth

We studied the factors (recent and older journals, publication types, electronic or print form, open or subscription access, funding, affiliation, language and home country of publisher) that contributed to the growth of literature in Biomedical and Life Sciences as reflected in PubMed in the period 2004–2013. Only records indexed as journal articles were studied. 7364,633 journal articles were added in PubMed between 2004 and 2013 (48.9% increase from 2003). Recently launched journals showed the greater increase in published articles, but older journals contributed the greater number of articles. The observed growth was mainly attributed to articles to which no other PubMed publication type was assigned. Articles available in both print and electronic form increased substantially (61.1%). Both open (80.8%) and subscription access (54.7%) articles increased significantly. Funding from non-US government sources also contributed significantly (74.5%). Asian (114%) and European (34.9%) first author affiliation increased at a higher rate than American publications (7.9%). English remained the predominant language of publications. USA- and England-based organizations published a gradually increasing body of literature. Open access, non-US government funding and Asian origin of the first author were the factors contributing to literature growth as depicted in PubMed. A better assignment of publication types is required.

[1]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Integrated care: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and literature review , 2014, International journal of integrated care.

[2]  Fadi Bitar,et al.  Research in Congenital Heart Disease: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis Between Developing and Developed Countries , 2013, Pediatric Cardiology.

[3]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review , 2013, European journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  Valentin Fuster,et al.  Impact factor versus impact to readers: not necessarily at odds. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  D. D. Des Jarlais,et al.  HIV research productivity and structural factors associated with HIV research output in European Union countries: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, BMJ Open.

[6]  M. Falagas,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[7]  B-Z Li,et al.  A bibliometric study of literature on SLE research in PubMed (2002–2011) , 2013, Lupus.

[8]  Antonella De Robbio Medline free on the Web : the PubMed and Internet Grateful Med services of the National Library of Medicine , 1997 .

[9]  Eva Alisic,et al.  Is traumatic stress research global? A bibliometric analysis , 2014, European journal of psychotraumatology.

[10]  L. Rollin,et al.  Precision and Recall of Search Strategies for Identifying Studies on Return-To-Work in Medline , 2009, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[11]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Matthew E. Falagas,et al.  The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation , 2008, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[13]  Ale Algra,et al.  Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[14]  O. Uthman,et al.  Geography of Africa biomedical publications: An analysis of 1996–2005 PubMed papers , 2007, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[15]  Andreas Lundh,et al.  Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[16]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[17]  Matthew E. Falagas,et al.  Increasing dominance of English in publications archived by PubMed , 2008, Scientometrics.

[18]  Theodora M Mauro,et al.  Comparison of publication trends in dermatology among Japan, South Korea and Mainland China , 2014, BMC Dermatology.

[19]  E. Dorsey,et al.  The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. , 2015, JAMA.

[20]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.

[21]  M van Rossum,et al.  Geographic origin of publications in surgical journals , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  B. Druss,et al.  Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[24]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[25]  U. Dirnagl,et al.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014, The Lancet.

[26]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.

[27]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[28]  Dario Gregori,et al.  Trends in RCT nursing research over 20 years: mind the gap. , 2014, British journal of nursing.

[29]  M. Falagas,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. , 2005, Chest.

[30]  Tsuguya Fukui,et al.  Biomedical publication--global profile and trend. , 2003, Public health.

[31]  Gideon Koren,et al.  Characteristics and publication patterns of obstetric studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov , 2014, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[32]  S. Wooding,et al.  The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research , 2011, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[33]  Christophe Boudry,et al.  Eye Neoplasms Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1966 to 2012 , 2015, European journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  Loredana Sasso,et al.  Public health research literature on infectious diseases: coverage and gaps in Europe. , 2007, European journal of public health.

[35]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  Prospective head and neck cancer research: a four-decade bibliometric perspective. , 2013, The oncologist.

[36]  Keiko Kurata,et al.  Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010 , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[38]  Z Haiqi,et al.  The tendency toward English-language papers in MEDLINE. , 1997, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[39]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing , 2011, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[40]  Ji‐you Li,et al.  Pathological research output in China and other top-ranking countries: 10-year survey of the literature. , 2010, Pathology, research and practice.

[41]  Cord Spreckelsen,et al.  The publication echo: Effects of retrieving literature in PubMed by year of publication , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[43]  Dirk Schoonbaert,et al.  PubMed growth patterns and visibility of journals of Sub-Saharan African origin. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[44]  A. Rodríguez-Morales,et al.  A bibliometric study of international scientific productivity in giardiasis covering the period 1971-2010. , 2015, Journal of infection in developing countries.

[45]  V Pistotti,et al.  Impact factor and electronic versions of biomedical scientific journals. , 2001, Haematologica.

[46]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study , 2013, Scientometrics.