Reinstating effortful encoding operations at test enhances episodic remembering

Two experiments investigated the effects of reinstating encoding operations on remember and know responses in recognition memory. Experiment 1 showed that reinstating an effortful encoding task (generating words from fragments) increased remember responses at test but reinstating an automatic encoding task (reading intact words) did not. This pattern was confirmed in Experiment 2 in which words were either read intact or generated from anagrams. These findings show that repeating effortful (but not automatic) encoding operations at test cues not only the recognition of the information that was acquired via those operations but also the conscious recollection of the encoding episode.

[1]  Jeffrey P. Lozito,et al.  An Asymmetry Between Memory Encoding and Retrieval , 2006, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[3]  R. Marsh,et al.  A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  V. Gregg,et al.  What do people actually remember (and know) in "remember/know" experiments? , 1997 .

[5]  D. C. Lecompte Recollective experience in the revelation effect: Separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[6]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Recognition memory and awareness: A large effect of study-test modalities on "know" responses following a highly perceptual orienting task , 1994 .

[7]  Z. Peynircioǧlu,et al.  The revelation effect: when disguising test items induces recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  J. Gardiner Functional aspects of recollective experience , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[9]  D. Schacter Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[10]  Elizabeth L. Glisky,et al.  Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. , 1985 .

[11]  L. Jacoby Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[12]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[13]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[14]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[15]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[16]  W. Macken Environmental context and recognition: the role of recollection and familiarity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  A. Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Remembering and knowing , 2000 .

[18]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Memory of self-performed tasks: Self-performing during recognition , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[19]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[20]  Agr McClelland,et al.  LEVELS OF PROCESSING , 1980 .

[21]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Remembering operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.