Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance Relations of Malaysian Bumiputera SMEs: The Impact of Some Perceived Environmental Factors

This study aims to verify direct relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and performance and the interaction of the perceived environment as third variable on EO-performance relation. The study was conducted on 210 firms among Bumiputera small and medium enterprises (BSMEs) in three states of northern Peninsular Malaysia, namely Penang, Kedah and Perlis. Using factor analysis and varimax rotation, each component was loaded with three items that has value of factor loadings more than .40. Factor analysis identified four factors of EO as independent variable namely, autonomy, innovativeness, proactiveness and risk taking dimensions. Perceived environmental factors consisted of five dimensions of munificence, turbulence, competition, market dynamism, and restrictiveness identified as moderators. Three dependent variables identified as return on sales (ROS) return on assets (ROA) and return on capital (ROC) used in the study. Four control variables of sole proprietorship; partnership, private limited company and small-sized firm were dummy-coded to ascertain their influence in performance. EO dimensions are multidimensional where each of the four dimensions is a separate component. Each of the components consists of three items. Hypothesis testing utilized four steps hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Four steps model shown in F-value and positive beta coefficient shows the statistical significance of direct relation and interaction effect. In the first step of the analysis, two control variables directly affected ROS. The second step of the analysis found direct relation of three EO dimensions related to higher performance. In the third step, all perceived environmental factors found directly related with performance. The fourth step detected interaction effect where significant model and beta coefficients further tested with post-hoc probing by curve analysis on 2x2 graphs. Perceived environmental factors moderated the relationship between EO and performance.

[1]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[2]  Teresa Joyce Covin,et al.  Competitive Aggressiveness, Environmental Context, and Small Firm Performance , 1990 .

[3]  S. Zahra,et al.  International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance - The moderating effect of international environmental hostility , 2000 .

[4]  Patrick M. Kreiser,et al.  Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-Country Analysis , 2002 .

[5]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[6]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization , 1994 .

[7]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle , 2001 .

[8]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[9]  H. Y. Teoh,et al.  Relationships Between Business Strategy, Environment and Controls: A Three Country Study , 2011 .

[10]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[11]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[12]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS for Windows : professional statistics, release 5 , 1992 .

[13]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  The Relationship between Environmental Dynamism and Small Firm Structure, Strategy, and Performance , 2000 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[15]  T. Begley,et al.  Psychological characteristics associated with performence in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses , 1987 .

[16]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[17]  C. Brunia,et al.  Wait and see. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[19]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[20]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[21]  Jeffrey G. Covin,et al.  Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models , 1997 .

[22]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[23]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables , 1981 .

[24]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. , 1996 .

[25]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[26]  Peng Lim Chee,et al.  Small industry in Malaysia , 1986 .

[27]  S. Zahra.  Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment , 1996 .

[28]  C. Smart,et al.  Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises , 1984 .

[29]  Mohd Khairuddin Hashim.  Small and medium-sized enterprises in Malaysia role and issues , 2002 .

[30]  David P. Boyd,et al.  A Comparison of Entrepreneurs and Managers of Small Business Firms , 1987 .

[31]  P. Khandwalla.  The design of organizations , 1977 .

[32]  J. L. Naman,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests , 1993 .

[33]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[34]  Marshall W. Meyer.  Structures, symbols, and systems : readings on organizational behavior , 1971 .

[35]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Moderator Variables in Leadership Research , 1986 .