Secrets and knowledge management strategy: the role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore in depth the mechanisms that organizations use to keep their innovations secret. This paper examines how, when and why secrecy appropriation mechanisms (SAMs) can enable innovators to appropriate value from their innovations. Design/methodology/approach Building from an extensive literature review of innovation and secrecy, the paper presents a number of implications for theory and research in the form of testable propositions. Findings This conceptualization proposes that SAMs can have both positive and negative effects on a number of organizational dynamics. SAMs involve tradeoffs, and the key to understanding whether they create value to organizations lies in understanding that these tradeoffs exist and the nature of these tradeoffs. Practical implications While most managers recognize the importance of secrecy in innovations, many struggle with the practical challenges of doing so. The paper presents guidance for managers to overcome these challenges. Originality/value This paper adds to previous research that has identified secrecy as an important appropriation mechanism for firms by digging deeper into the details of SAMs and exploring their sources, characteristics and effects.

[1]  M. Reitzig,et al.  Private-Collective Innovation, Competition, and Firms’ Counterintuitive Appropriation Strategies , 2011 .

[2]  K. Bizer,et al.  To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector , 2013 .

[3]  Gerard George,et al.  Appropriability and the retrieval of knowledge after spillovers , 2016 .

[4]  Ronald L. Dufresne,et al.  On the Virtues of Secrecy in Organizations , 2008 .

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Rationality-Based Beliefs and Information Security Awareness , 2010, MIS Q..

[6]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[7]  David P. Cooper,et al.  Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility ☆ , 2001 .

[8]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  Ritchie P. Lowry.  Toward a Sociology of Secrecy and Security Systems , 1972 .

[10]  James J. Anton,et al.  Little patents and big secrets: managing intellectual property , 2004 .

[11]  Darío Milesi,et al.  Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata , 2013 .

[12]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Can Businesses Effectively Regulate Employee Conduct? The Antecedents of Rule Following in Work Settings , 2005 .

[13]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[14]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[15]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Revealing Family Secrets: The Influence of Topic, Function, and Relationships , 1997 .

[16]  Daniel Rigney.  Secrecy and social cohesion , 1979 .

[17]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  Marina Apaydin,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010 .

[19]  David R. Hannah.  Keeping trade secrets secret , 2006 .

[20]  G. Fine,et al.  Secrecy, Trust, and Dangerous Leisure: Generating Group Cohesion in Voluntary Organizations , 1996 .

[21]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Keeping Organizational Secrets: Protective Institutional Mechanisms and their Costs , 1997 .

[22]  David R. Hannah,et al.  Why and How Do Employees Break and Bend Confidential Information Protection Rules? , 2015 .

[23]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Appropriability Regime for Radical and Incremental Innovations , 2008 .

[24]  T. Luhrmann.  The Magic of Secrecy , 1989 .

[25]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances , 1997 .

[26]  Nuria González-Álvarez,et al.  APPROPRIABILITY OF INNOVATION RESULTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2007 .

[27]  Michael P. Simpson.  The Future of Innovation: Trade Secrets, Property Rights, and Protectionism - an Age-Old Tale , 2005 .

[28]  Juuso Toikka,et al.  Simultaneous Model of Innovation, Secrecy, and Patent Policy , 2006 .

[29]  Beryl Bellman.  The language of secrecy: Symbols & metaphors in Poro ritual , 1984 .

[30]  David R. Hannah,et al.  It’s a secret : Marketing value and the denial of availability , 2014 .

[31]  D. Merten,et al.  ENCULTURATION INTO SECRECY AMONG JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS , 1999 .

[32]  P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen.  Constituents and outcomes of absorptive capacity – appropriability regime changing the game , 2012 .

[33]  David R. Hannah.  Should I Keep a Secret? The Effects of Trade Secret Protection Procedures on Employees' Obligations to Protect Trade Secrets , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[34]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[35]  Emilie-Pauline Gallié,et al.  French firms’ strategies for protecting their intellectual property , 2012 .

[36]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Bringing Secrecy into the Open: Towards a Theorization of the Social Processes of Organizational Secrecy , 2014 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[38]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[39]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[40]  P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,et al.  Nature and Dynamics of Appropriability: Strategies for Appropriating Returns on Innovation , 2007 .

[41]  Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,et al.  The availability, strength and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms - protecting investments in knowledge creation , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[42]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation , 2009 .

[43]  M. Leiblein,et al.  How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations , 2013 .

[44]  David R. Hannah.  An Examination of the Factors that Influence Whether Newcomers Protect or Share Secrets of Their Former Employers , 2007 .

[45]  Peter Neuhäusler.  The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms—Differences between sectors and among companies , 2012 .

[46]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[47]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice , 2014 .

[48]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[49]  H. Barros.  Exploring the use of patents in a weak institutional environment: The effects of innovation partnerships, firm ownership, and new management practices , 2015 .

[50]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[51]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Effects of intellectual property rights and patented knowledge in innovation and industry value added: A multinational empirical analysis of different industries , 2015 .

[52]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs , 2006, Organ. Sci..