Measurement of whole-body vibration exposure from speed control humps

The main objective of speed control humps is to introduce shocks and high vibration levels when a car passes over them if its speed is higher than the allowable limit. Hump geometry is a major factor in altering the level of these shocks and specifying the speed limit. However, there is no study of the relationship between whole body vibration due to passing over a speed control hump and lower back pain or occupational diseases. In this study, an experimental investigation is conducted to evaluate health risks associated with different geometry speed control humps. Vibration levels and shocks are measured by a seat pad accelerometer placed under the driver's seat to evaluate hazard risks on the human body's lower back. The assessment is based on two standard methods of measuring whole body vibration: the British standard BS 6841 and the new ISO/DIS standard 2631-5. These methods are used to assess the effects of vehicle type, passenger location in the vehicle, vehicle speed, and speed control hump geometry. It was found that circular speed control humps currently installed on many public roads should be modified in order to eliminate hazards. Two newly designed speed humps were proved to be less hazardous than circular speed control humps.

[1]  G R Watts.  ROAD HUMPS FOR THE CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEEDS , 1973 .

[2]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A comparison of standardized methods for predicting the hazards of whole-body vibration and repeated shocks , 1998 .

[3]  J Sandover,et al.  Dynamic Loading as a Possible Source of Low-Back Disorders , 1983, Spine.

[4]  Professor Dr. Heinrich Dupuis,et al.  The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration , 1986, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[5]  Himmat S. Chadda,et al.  Speed (Road) Bumps: Issues and Opinions , 1985 .

[6]  J. Sandover.  High acceleration events : An introduction and review of expert opinion , 1998 .

[7]  Hugh W. Davies,et al.  Whole body vibrations and back disorders among motor vehicle drivers and heavy equipment operators: a review of the scientific evidence , 1999 .

[8]  R Thomas,et al.  Road humps: accident prevention or hazard? , 1996, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[9]  Eckardt Johanning,et al.  Whole-body vibration exposure study in U.S. railroad locomotives--an ergonomic risk assessment. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[10]  Setsuo Maeda,et al.  Comparison of the apparent mass during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration between Japanese subjects and ISO 5982 standard. , 2005, Industrial health.

[11]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Effect of seating on exposures to whole-body vibration in vehicles , 2002 .

[12]  Emad Khorshid,et al.  A numerical study on the optimal geometric design of speed control humps , 2004 .

[13]  J Giacomin,et al.  Some observations regarding the vibrational environment in child safety seats. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  John P. Braaksma,et al.  TOWARDS A NORTH AMERICAN GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARD FOR SPEED HUMPS , 2000 .

[15]  Jean Cross,et al.  Vibration and jarring as a cause of back injury in the NSW coal mining industry , 1994 .

[16]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Health effects of long-term occupational exposure to whole-body vibration: A review , 1994 .

[17]  J D Troup,et al.  Clinical effects of shock and vibration on the spine. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  T De Wit.  DUTCH EXPERIENCES WITH SPEED CONTROL HUMPS , 1993 .

[19]  C. Leboeuf‐Yde,et al.  Whole-body vibration and low back pain: a systematic, critical review of the epidemiological literature 1992–1999 , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.