AMPDXA for Precision Bone Loss Measurements on Earth and in Space

one loss and its strength-related implications are major health concerns for our aging earthbound population and for astronauts exposed to microgravity during long-duration spacefl ight. Key to understanding the causal mechanisms of both age-related osteoporosis and microgravity-induced bone loss is the ability to make precision bone loss and bone structural measurements. The Advanced Multiple-Projection Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (AMPDXA) scanning system is being developed at APL to meet this need. This article describes the development of the AMPDXA system, funded by the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), over the last several years, including progress made in human bone imaging, bone mineral density determination, and bone structural measurements. It also presents general information on bone loss, the effi cacy of bone loss countermeasures, and the inherent differences between age-related osteoporosis and microgravity-induced bone loss. The current effort will continue for the next 4 years and will culminate in the delivery to the NSBRI and NASA of a ground-based clinical system suitable for pre- and postfl ight testing of astronauts.

[1]  Alexander V. Kildishev,et al.  Health Effects and Safety of Intense Gradient Fields , 2000 .

[2]  H K Charles,et al.  Precision bone and muscle loss measurements by advanced, multiple projection DEXA (AMPDXA) techniques for spaceflight applications. , 2001, Acta astronautica.

[3]  R. Pietrzyk,et al.  Alterations in renal stone risk factors after space flight. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[4]  T J Beck,et al.  Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. , 2000, Bone.

[5]  A Fenster,et al.  An accurate method for direct dual-energy calibration and decomposition. , 1990, Medical physics.

[6]  Il'in Vn,et al.  [The readaptation of the respiration, blood circulation and body oxygen regimen in aquanauts after saturation dives to depths of up to 450 m]. , 1992 .

[7]  M. Whittle,et al.  Proceedings: Bone mineral content changes in the Skylab astronauts. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Thomas S. Spisz,et al.  Determination of bone structural parameters from multiple projection DXA images , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  A. Leblanc,et al.  [Bone mineral density in cosmonauts after flights lasting 4.5-6 months on the Mir orbital station]. , 1992, Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine.

[10]  R. Recker,et al.  Heterogeneity of bone mineral density across skeletal sites and its clinical implications. , 1998, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[11]  Christopher B. Ruff,et al.  Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: A structural analysis of bone mineral data , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[12]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[13]  A LeBlanc,et al.  Regional muscle loss after short duration spaceflight. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry for stress fracture prediction in male U.S. marine corps recruits , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  P. Miller,et al.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[16]  J. Pouilles,et al.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.