A comparison of computing architectures for ultrasonic signal processing

The design of advanced sonar modules implies the use of more and more complex processing algorithms, in order to obtain as much information as possible from the environment. The use of simultaneous emission and reception techniques in certain transducers, that form an ultrasonic sensorial module, allows to increase the benefits and the performance of this type of systems. These developments make possible to obtain more information for every ultrasonic emission, diminishing the scanning time and improving the interpretation and usefulness of the obtained results. These techniques are usually based on the encoding of the ultrasonic emission, so the received signals can be correlated in order to search For possible echoes. As a consequence, the computational complexity necessary to carry out the implementation of the new algorithms increases considerably. The analysis of possible computing platforms for the real-time processing of the new algorithms becomes a task of great importance. In this work, some computing architectures are analysed and compared, in order to determine which scheme is most suitable for the ultrasonic signal processing.

[1]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  Accurate ranging of multiple objects using ultrasonic sensors , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[3]  R. Muller,et al.  A comprehensive robotic model for neural & acoustic signal processing in bats , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[4]  Álvaro Hernández,et al.  Real-time implementation of an efficient Golay correlator (EGC) applied to ultrasonic sensorial systems , 2003, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[5]  Billur Barshan,et al.  Fractional Fourier transform pre-processing for neural networks and its application to object recognition , 2002, Neural Networks.

[6]  Phillip J. McKerrow,et al.  Plant acoustic density profile model of CTFM ultrasonic sensing , 2001 .

[7]  J.J. Garcia,et al.  Using Golay complementary sequences for multi-mode ultrasonic operation , 1999, 1999 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings ETFA '99 (Cat. No.99TH8467).

[8]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  A high-resolution sensor based on tri-aural perception , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  J. Urena,et al.  Ultrasonic ranging sensor using simultaneous emissions from different transducers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  E. Colle,et al.  Optimal Estimation of the Range for Mobile Robots Using Ultrasonic Sensors , 1997 .

[11]  B. Popović Efficient Golay correlator , 1999 .

[12]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Error eliminating rapid ultrasonic firing for mobile robot obstacle avoidance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..