Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance.

[1]  E. Nagel,et al.  EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: results of the German pilot phase. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Mulvagh,et al.  Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  N. Weissman,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease with perfusion stress echocardiography using a novel ultrasound imaging agent: two Phase 3 international trials in comparison with radionuclide perfusion imaging. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography: a 25-year retrospective. , 2008, Circulation.

[5]  C. Stefanadis,et al.  Safety of myocardial flash-contrast echocardiography in combination with dobutamine stress testing for the detection of ischaemia in 5250 studies , 2008, Heart.

[6]  A. van Rossum,et al.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. , 2008, European heart journal.

[7]  T. Porter,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Disease with a Continuous Infusion of Definity Ultrasound Contrast during Adenosine Stress Real Time Perfusion Echocardiography , 2007, Echocardiography.

[8]  R. Carlos,et al.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Robson,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  C. Vlachopoulos,et al.  The diagnostic value of adenosine stress-contrast echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: comparison to Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[11]  B. Gerber,et al.  Release of cardiac bio-markers during high mechanical index contrast-enhanced echocardiography in humans. , 2007, European heart journal.

[12]  Sebastian Kelle,et al.  Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests: Adenosine Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[13]  Otto Kamp,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography evolving as a clinically feasible technique for accurate, rapid, and safe assessment of myocardial perfusion: the evidence so far. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G. Lazaros,et al.  Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with SPECT in the evaluation of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with LBBB. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[15]  N. Pandian,et al.  A Head‐to‐Head Comparison of Infusion and Bolus Doses of Adenosine for Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography , 2006, Echocardiography.

[16]  Igor Klem,et al.  mproved Detection of Coronary rtery Disease by Stress Perfusion ardiovascular Magnetic Resonance With he Use of Delayed Enhancement Infarction Imaging , 2006 .

[17]  Harald Becher,et al.  Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Dencker,et al.  Real‐time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography versus myocardial perfusion adenosine scintigraphy for the detection of myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease , 2006, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[19]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Echocardiography , 2005, Circulation.

[20]  William A Zoghbi,et al.  Stress echocardiography: current methodology and clinical applications. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  P. Gudmundsson,et al.  Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography in the coronary care unit: a feasible bedside tool for predicting coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2003, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[22]  Daniel C. Lee,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Versus Radionuclide Pharmacological Stress Perfusion Imaging for Flow-Limiting Stenoses of Varying Severity , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[24]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[25]  G Van Camp,et al.  Destruction of Contrast Microbubbles by Ultrasound: Effects on Myocardial Function, Coronary Perfusion Pressure, and Microvascular Integrity , 2001, Circulation.

[26]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  P A van Der Wouw,et al.  Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[28]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine , 1999, The Lancet.

[29]  J R Roelandt,et al.  Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  E. Picano,et al.  Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study , 1994, The Lancet.

[31]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  E. Picano,et al.  Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. , 1994, Lancet.

[33]  M. Verani,et al.  Tolerance and safety of pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine in association with thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  M. Verani,et al.  Quantitative thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography during maximal pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine for assessing coronary artery disease. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  R. Nesto,et al.  The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.