Exploring schema-driven differences in situation awareness between road users: an on-road study of driver, cyclist and motorcyclist situation awareness

Collisions between different road users make a substantial contribution to road trauma. Although evidence suggests that different road users interpret the same road situations differently, it is not clear how road users' situation awareness differs, nor is it clear which differences might lead to conflicts. This article presents the findings from an on-road study conducted to examine driver, motorcyclist and cyclist situation awareness in different road environments. The findings suggest that, in addition to minor differences in the structure of different road users' situation awareness (i.e. amount of information and how it is integrated), the actual content of situation awareness in terms of road user schemata, the resulting interaction with the world and the information underpinning situation awareness is markedly different. Further examination indicates that the differences are likely to be compatible along arterial roads, shopping strips and at roundabouts, but that they may create conflicts between different road users at intersections. Interventions designed to support compatible situation awareness and behaviour between different road users are discussed. Practitioner Summary: Incompatible situation awareness plays a key role in collisions between different road users (e.g. drivers and motorcyclists). This on-road study examined situation awareness in drivers, motorcyclists and cyclists, identifying the key differences and potential conflicts that arise. The findings are used to propose interventions designed to enhance the compatibility of situation awareness between road users.

[1]  Jacques Leplat,et al.  Evaluation of Different Modalities of Verbalization in a Sorting Task , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Christophe Mundutéguy,et al.  A Contribution to Situation Awareness Analysis , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  MOTORCYCLE CONSPICUITY: AN EVALUATION AND SYNTHESIS OF INFLUENTIAL FACTORS , 1989 .

[4]  David D Clarke,et al.  The role of motorcyclist and other driver behaviour in two types of serious accident in the UK. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  U. Neisser.  Cognitive Psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology) , 1976 .

[6]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[7]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  From ethnography to the EAST method: A tractable approach for representing distributed cognition in Air Traffic Control , 2010, Ergonomics.

[8]  P A Hancock,et al.  Driver workload during differing driving maneuvers. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Tami Toroyan,et al.  Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action , 2009 .

[10]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness on the road: review, theoretical and methodological issues, and future directions , 2012 .

[11]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  The blind date: the effects of change blindness, passenger conversation and gender on looked-but-failed-to-see (LBFTS) errors. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth , 2014, Ergonomics.

[13]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis , 2006, Ergonomics.

[15]  Joanne M Wood,et al.  Drivers' and cyclists' experiences of sharing the road: incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Christophe Mundutéguy,et al.  Risk and threat factors in prior representations of driving situations among powered two-wheeler riders and car drivers. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  N. Stanton,et al.  The explanatory power of Schema Theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in Ergonomics , 2013, Ergonomics.

[18]  Michelle Rita Grech,et al.  Human Error in Maritime Operations: Analyses of Accident Reports Using the Leximancer Tool , 2002 .

[19]  Thierry Brenac,et al.  Motorcyclists' speed and "looked-but-failed-to-see" accidents. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Cognitive compatibility of motorcyclists and car drivers. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  S. P. Akpabio.  World Health Organisation , 1983, British Dental Journal.

[22]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Does advanced driver training improve situational awareness? , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  David Crundall,et al.  Motorcyclists' and car drivers' responses to hazards , 2010 .

[25]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Compatible cognition amongst road users: The compatibility of driver, motorcyclist, and cyclist situation awareness , 2013 .

[28]  Alessandra Marinoni,et al.  Are car drivers holding a motorcycle licence less responsible for motorcycle--car crash occurrence? A non-parametric approach. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Elizabeth Crundall,et al.  Why do car drivers fail to give way to motorcycles at t-junctions? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Penelope M Sanderson,et al.  State-space and verbal protocol methods for studying the human operator in process control. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[31]  Sandra Knapp,et al.  Command and control , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Eric Schlosser.  Command and Control , 2013 .

[33]  N A Stanton,et al.  Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology , 2006, Ergonomics.

[34]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems , 2009 .