Healthy and dystonic children compensate for changes in motor variability.

Successful reaching requires that we plan movements to compensate for variability in motor output. Previous studies have shown that healthy adults optimally incorporate estimates of motor variability when planning a pointing task. Children with dystonia have increased variability compared with healthy children. It is not known whether they are able to compensate appropriately for the increased variability and whether this compensation leads to changes in reaching behavior. We examined healthy children and those with increased motor variability due to secondary dystonia. Using a simple virtual display, children performed a motor task where the variability of their movements was manipulated. Results showed that both subject groups changed their movement strategies in response to changes in the level of perceived motor variability. Both groups changed their strategy in a way that improved performance relative to the perceived motor variability. Importantly, dystonic children faced with decreased motor variability adapted their movement strategy to perform better and more similarly to healthy children. These findings show that both healthy and dystonic children are able to respond to changes in motor variability and alter their movement strategies.

[1]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Compensation for Changing Motor Uncertainty , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  T. Sanger Arm Trajectories in Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy Have Increased Random Variability , 2006, Journal of child neurology.

[4]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Masaki O. Abe,et al.  Variability, Noise, and Sensitivity to Error in Learning a Motor Task , 2010 .

[7]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[8]  T. Sanger,et al.  Force variability during isometric biceps contraction in children with secondary dystonia due to cerebral palsy , 2009, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[9]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Does dystonia always include co-contraction? A study of unconstrained reaching in children with primary and secondary dystonia , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  T. Sanger,et al.  Reaching Movements in Childhood Dystonia Contain Signal-Dependent Noise , 2005, Journal of child neurology.

[11]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Definition and Classification of Negative Motor Signs in Childhood , 2006, Pediatrics.

[12]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[14]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[15]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Vitek Pathophysiology of dystonia: A neuronal model , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[17]  D. Wolpert,et al.  TOPS (Task Optimization in the Presence of Signal-Dependent Noise) model , 2004 .

[18]  J. Duysens,et al.  Children with congenital spastic hemiplegia obey Fitts’ Law in a visually guided tapping task , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Optimal Control Predicts Human Performance on Objects with Internal Degrees of Freedom , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Motor learning: changes in the structure of variability in a redundant task. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[22]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Neuromotor Noise, Error Tolerance and Velocity-Dependent Costs in Skilled Performance , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Hallett,et al.  Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[27]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  State space analysis of timing: exploiting task redundancy to reduce sensitivity to timing. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[29]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Bayesian integration in force estimation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Sternad,et al.  Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Ira B. Perelle,et al.  An international study of human handedness: The data , 1994, Behavior genetics.