Evaluation of the COPERT III emission model with on-road optical remote sensing measurements

Abstract At present, the COPERT III model is the most commonly used model in Europe for official national inventories of emissions from road traffic. In this study, the COPERT III model (version 2.1) was evaluated by utilizing a dataset available from on-road optical remote sensing emission measurements on a large number of vehicles at three different sites in Gothenburg, Sweden, in 2001 and 2002. The remote sensing dataset contained fuel-specific emissions (grams of pollutant emitted per liter of fuel burnt) of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO) and hydrocarbons (HC) as well as speed and acceleration data for individual vehicles. For gasoline passenger cars, a total of approximately 20 000 records with valid CO and HC remote sensor readings, and 16 000 records with valid NO readings were available for the COPERT III evaluation. For diesel passenger cars and heavy-duty vehicles the remote sensing dataset contained 1100 and 650 records with valid NO readings, respectively. Average fuel-specific emission factors derived from the remote sensing measurements were compared with corresponding emission factors derived from COPERT III calculations for urban, hot stabilized conditions and average speed around 45 km h −1 . The results show a good agreement between the two methods for gasoline passenger cars’ NO x emissions for all COPERT III subsectors (i.e. cylinder volume classes) and technology classes (e.g. EURO 1, 2, 3). In the case of CO emissions, the agreement was less favorable, with the model overpredicting emissions for all but one of the technology classes. For gasoline passenger cars’ HC emissions the model-to-measurement agreement was reasonably good, although with a tendency for the model to overpredict the emissions. There was also a relatively good agreement for NO x emission factors for diesel passenger cars. Finally, NO x emission factors for heavy-duty vehicles according to the COPERT III model were systematically lower than those from the remote sensing measurements, and in particular the reduction between EURO 2 and EURO 3 tended to be overestimated by the model. The study has demonstrated the potential and usefulness of on-road optical remote sensing for emission model evaluation purposes.

[1]  Christian John,et al.  COMPARISON OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR ROAD TRAFFIC FROM A TUNNEL STUDY (GUBRIST TUNNEL, SWITZERLAND) AND FROM EMISSION MODELING , 1999 .

[2]  Daniel A. Burgard,et al.  On-Road Remote Sensing of Automobile Emissions in the Denver Area: Year 4, January 2003 , 2003 .

[3]  Robert A. Gorse ON-ROAD EMISSION RATES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, NITROGEN OXIDES, AND GASEOUS HYDROCARBONS , 1984 .

[4]  G. Bishop,et al.  Automobile emissions are statistically gamma distributed. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Measurement of nitrous acid in motor vehicle exhaust , 1996 .

[6]  Johannes Rodler,et al.  VALIDATION OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR ROAD VEHICLES BASED ON STREET TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS , 2000 .

[7]  G. Bishop,et al.  Development of a High-Speed Ultraviolet Spectrometer for Remote Sensing of Mobile Source Nitric Oxide Emissions. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  G. Bishop,et al.  IR long-path photometry: a remote sensing tool for automobile emissions. , 1989, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  S. Hausberger Simulation of Real World Vehicle Exhaust Emissions , 2003 .

[10]  J. Kretzschmar,et al.  Air pollution measurements in traffic tunnels. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  J. M. Norbeck,et al.  CO Emission Rates for In-Use Gasoline and Diesel Vehicles , 1981 .

[12]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Real-world automotive emissions—Summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora mountain tunnels , 1995 .

[13]  Brett C Singer,et al.  A Fuel-Based Motor Vehicle Emission Inventory. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  M. C. Paputa Peck,et al.  Air Toxics: A Comparison of the Gas - and Particle-Phase Emissions from a High-Emitter Vehicle with Those from a Normal-Emitter Vehicle , 1994 .

[15]  Alan W. Gertler,et al.  Comparison of MOBILE4.1 and MOBILE5 predictions with measurements of vehicle emission factors in Fort McHenry and Tuscarora mountain tunnels , 1996 .

[16]  G. Bishop,et al.  An on-road motor vehicle emissions inventory for Denver: an efficient alternative to modeling , 2002 .

[17]  Gary A. Bishop,et al.  ON-ROAD REMOTE SENSING OF AUTOMOBILE EMISSIONS IN THE DENVER AREA: YEAR 2 , 2001 .

[18]  A. Gertler,et al.  Comparison of the SCAQS Tunnel Study with Other On Road Vehicle Emission Data , 1990 .

[19]  G. Bishop,et al.  The effects of altitude on heavy-duty diesel truck on-road emissions. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  R. Harley,et al.  Scaling of Infrared Remote Sensor Hydrocarbon Measurements for Motor Vehicle Emission Inventory Calculations , 1998 .

[21]  G. Bishop,et al.  A hydrocarbon detector for the remote sensing of vehicle exhaust emissions , 1995 .