The Association Between Financial Reporting Risk and Audit Fees Before and After the Historic Events Surrounding SOX

This study investigates whether the association between financial reporting risk and audit fees changed during 2000-2003: a time period marked by momentous and historic events for auditors. We find a positive statistically and economically significant relationship between financial reporting risk and audit fees paid to Big 4 auditors. More importantly, we predict and find that the relation between financial reporting risk and audit fees strengthened significantly in 2002 and 2003, consistent with a shift in the way auditors priced risk, likely in response to the events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Finally, we provide evidence that a commercially developed, comprehensive risk measure effectively proxies for an element of risk beyond what has traditionally been captured by various risk measures in audit fee models: namely, the risk that financial statements have been intentionally misstated. We believe this risk measure will be of interest to future researchers.

[1]  D. Simunic.  The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence , 1980 .

[2]  R. Houston,et al.  The Effects of Fee Pressure and Client Risk on Audit Seniors' Time Budget Decisions , 1999 .

[3]  Dasaratha V. Rama,et al.  SOX Section 404 Material Weakness Disclosures and Audit Fees , 2006 .

[4]  Sanjay Kallapur,et al.  Client Importance, Nonaudit Services, and Abnormal Accruals , 2003 .

[5]  M. McNichols.  Research design issues in earnings management studies , 2000 .

[6]  Stephen A. Zeff,et al.  How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part II , 2003 .

[7]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[8]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  A Market-Based Evaluation of Discretionary-Accrual Models , 1996 .

[9]  J. D. Lyon,et al.  The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct , 2004 .

[10]  Karla M. Zehms,et al.  Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors' Planning and Pricing Decisions , 2004 .

[11]  Philip Beaulieu.  The Effects of Judgments of New Clients' Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence, and Fees , 2001 .

[12]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals , 1994 .

[13]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance , 2004 .

[14]  D. Hay,et al.  Audit Fees: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes , 2006 .

[15]  W. Knechel,et al.  Resource Allocation Decisions in Audit Engagements , 1997 .

[16]  Gary F. Peters,et al.  The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees , 2003 .

[17]  F. Phillips.  Auditor Attention to and Judgments of Aggressive Financial Reporting , 1999 .

[18]  Thomas C. Omer,et al.  Exploring the Term of the Auditor‐Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? , 2003 .

[19]  F. Gul,et al.  Discretionary Accounting Accruals, Managers' Incentives and Audit Fees , 2003 .

[20]  Dana R. Hermanson,et al.  Board Characteristics and Audit Fees , 2000 .

[21]  Jeffrey R. Cohen,et al.  Auditors' Consideration of Corporate Governance and Management Control Philosophy in Preplanning and Planning Judgments , 2000 .

[22]  Marilyn F. Johnson,et al.  The Relation between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management , 2002 .

[23]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  DETECTING EARNINGS MANAGEMENT , 1994 .