How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes

Products, styles, and social movements often catch on and become popular, but little is known about why such identity-relevant cultural tastes and practices die out. We demonstrate that the velocity of adoption may affect abandonment: Analysis of over 100 years of data on first-name adoption in both France and the United States illustrates that cultural tastes that have been adopted quickly die faster (i.e., are less likely to persist). Mirroring this aggregate pattern, at the individual level, expecting parents are more hesitant to adopt names that recently experienced sharper increases in adoption. Further analysis indicate that these effects are driven by concerns about symbolic value: Fads are perceived negatively, so people avoid identity-relevant items with sharply increasing popularity because they believe that they will be short lived. Ancillary analyses also indicate that, in contrast to conventional wisdom, identity-relevant cultural products that are adopted quickly tend to be less successful overall (i.e., reduced cumulative adoption). These results suggest a potential alternate way to explain diffusion patterns that are traditionally seen as driven by saturation of a pool of potential adopters. They also shed light on one factor that may lead cultural tastes to die out.

[1]  Jonah A. Berger,et al.  Shifting Signals to Help Health: Using Identity-Signaling to Reduce Risky Health Behaviors , 2008 .

[2]  Chip Heath,et al.  Who Drives Divergence? Identity-Signaling, Outgroup Dissimilarity, and the Abandonment of Cultural Tastes , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Y. Kashima A Social Psychology of Cultural Dynamics: Examining How Cultures Are Formed, Maintained, and Transformed , 2008 .

[4]  Edward Telles,et al.  Assimilation and Gender in Naming , 2007 .

[5]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[6]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[7]  Chip Heath,et al.  Idea Habitats: How the Prevalence of Environmental Cues Influences the Success of Ideas , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Stephen J Shennan,et al.  Random drift and culture change , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Popularity as Taste , 2003 .

[11]  Takahiko Masuda,et al.  Culture and point of view. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names , 2003 .

[13]  M. Schaller,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture , 2003 .

[14]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Popularity as a Taste: An Application to the Naming Process , 2003 .

[15]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change , 2002 .

[17]  S. Levy Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[18]  Wolfgang Pesendorfer,et al.  Design Innovation and Fashion Cycles , 1995 .

[19]  R. Cialdini Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[20]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Velocity relation : satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time , 1991 .

[21]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[22]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  The role of attitude objects in attitude functions , 1990 .

[23]  C. Martindale The clockwork muse , 1990 .

[24]  H. Blossfeld Techniques of event history modeling , 1989 .

[25]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[26]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[27]  Robert Mc Ginnis CHAINS OF OPPORTUNITY: SYSTEM MODELS OF MOBILITY IN ORGANIZATIONS. By Harrison C. White. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. 418 pp. $15.00 , 1972 .

[28]  Paul McReynolds,et al.  The “Need for Novelty”: A Comparison of Six Instruments , 1967 .

[29]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[30]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Notes on a Natural History of Fads , 1957, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  H. Leibenstein Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand , 1950 .