Correlated Drug Action as a Baseline Model for Combination Therapy in Patient Cohorts and Cell Cultures

Identifying and characterizing the effect of combination therapies is of paramount importance in various diseases, including cancer. Various competing null models have been proposed to serve as baselines against which to compare the effect of drug combinations. In this work, we introduce Correlated Drug Action (CDA), a baseline model for the study of drug combinations in both cell cultures and in patient populations. CDA assumes that the efficacy of pairs of drugs to be used in a combination may be correlated, that is, if the efficacy of a drug in a given patient or cell is high (low), then the efficacy of the other drug may also be high (low) in the same patient or cell. Our model can be used in the temporal domain (temporal CDA or tCDA) to explain survival curves in patient populations, and in the dose domain (dose CDA or dCDA), to explain dose-response curves in cell cultures. At the level of clinical trials, we demonstrate tCDA’s utility in identifying possibly synergistic combinations and cases where the combination can be explained in terms of the monotherapies. At the level of cells in culture, dCDA generalizes null models such as Bliss independence, the Highest Single Agent model, the dose equivalence principle, and is consistent with what should be expected in sham combinations. We demonstrate the applicability of dCDA in assessing combinations in experimental MCF7 cell-line data by introducing a new metric, the Excess over CDA (EOCDA).

[1]  F. Liu,et al.  Independent drug action and its statistical implications for development of combination therapies. , 2020, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  A. Califano,et al.  The transcriptomic response of cells to a drug combination is more than the sum of the responses to the monotherapies , 2019, bioRxiv.

[3]  S. Phinn,et al.  Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation , 2019, Nature Communications.

[4]  E. Revilla,et al.  Brown bear attacks on humans: a worldwide perspective , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Robert M. Vogel,et al.  Mitochondrial origins of fractional control in regulated cell death , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  Keisha N. Hardeman,et al.  Quantifying Drug Combination Synergy along Potency and Efficacy Axes. , 2019, Cell systems.

[7]  J. Hasenauer,et al.  Comparison of null models for combination drug therapy reveals Hand model as biochemically most plausible , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-to-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy , 2017, Cell.

[9]  Herman Yeger,et al.  Combination therapy in combating cancer , 2017, Oncotarget.

[10]  Y-Y Hsieh,et al.  Repositioning of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor GW8510 as a ribonucleotide reductase M2 inhibitor to treat human colorectal cancer , 2016, Cell Death Discovery.

[11]  Jing Tang,et al.  What is synergy? The Saariselkä agreement revisited , 2015, Front. Pharmacol..

[12]  P. Rutkowski,et al.  Trametinib: a MEK inhibitor for management of metastatic melanoma , 2015, OncoTargets and therapy.

[13]  P. Lorigan,et al.  Dabrafenib and its use in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. , 2015, Melanoma management.

[14]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Mickael Guedj,et al.  Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape , 2015, Pharmacology research & perspectives.

[16]  W. Bodmer,et al.  Cancer cell lines for drug discovery and development. , 2014, Cancer research.

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Understanding resistance to combination chemotherapy. , 2012, Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy.

[18]  V. Devita,et al.  Two hundred years of cancer research. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Baeten,et al.  Combination HIV Prevention: Significance, Challenges, and Opportunities , 2011, Current HIV/AIDS reports.

[20]  Edward Chu,et al.  A history of cancer chemotherapy. , 2008, Cancer research.

[21]  P. Sorger,et al.  Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[22]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  W. Greco,et al.  The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. , 1995, Pharmacological reviews.

[24]  K. Propert,et al.  Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Berenbaum Mc What is synergy? , 1989, Pharmacological reviews.

[26]  M. Berenbaum What is synergy? , 1989, Pharmacological reviews.

[27]  V. Jordan,et al.  Antitumor actions of keoxifene and tamoxifen in the N-nitrosomethylurea-induced rat mammary carcinoma model. , 1987, Cancer research.

[28]  R. H. Levin,et al.  The effectiveness of combinations of antileukemic agents in inducing and maintaining remission in children with acute leukemia. , 1965, Blood.

[29]  Emil Frei,et al.  The Effect of 6-Mercaptopurine on the Duration of Steroid-induced Remissions in Acute Leukemia: A Model for Evaluation of Other Potentially Useful Therapy , 1963 .

[30]  Emil Frei,et al.  Studies of Sequential and Combination Antimetabolite Therapy in Acute Leukemia: 6-Mercaptopurine and Methotrexate , 1961 .

[31]  C. I. Bliss The calculation of microbial assays. , 1956, Bacteriological reviews.

[32]  S. Loewe The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs. , 1953, Arzneimittel-Forschung.

[33]  C. I. Bliss THE TOXICITY OF POISONS APPLIED JOINTLY1 , 1939 .