Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems

This paper describes a fundamental dual tradeoff that occurs in systems supporting awareness for distributed work groups, and presents several specific new techniques which illustrate good compromise points within this tradeoff space. This dual tradeoff is between privacy and awareness, and between awareness and disturbance. Simply stated, the more information about oneself that leaves your work area, the more potential for awareness of you exists for your colleagues. Unfortunately, this also represents the greatest potential for intrusion on your privacy. Similarly, the more information that is received about the activities of colleagues, the more potential awareness we have of them. However, at the same time, the more information we receive, the greater the chance that the information will become a disturbance to our normal work. This dual tradeoff seems to be a fundamental one. However, by carefully examining awareness problems in the light of this tradeoff it is possible to devise techniques which expose new points in the design space. These new points provide different types and quantities of information so that awareness can be achieved without invading the privacy of the sender, or creating a disturbance for the receiver. This paper presents four such techniques, each based on a careful selection of the information transmitted.

[1]  Robert W. Root,et al.  Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing , 1988, CSCW '88.

[2]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Supporting awareness in a Distributed Work Group , 1992 .

[3]  John C. Tang,et al.  What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study , 1993, MULTIMEDIA '93.

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[5]  William W. Gaver The affordances of media spaces for collaboration , 1992, CSCW '92.

[6]  Christian Heath,et al.  Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment , 1991, CHI.

[7]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Effective sounds in complex systems: the ARKOLA simulation , 1991, CHI.

[8]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Experiences in the use of a media space , 1991, CHI.

[9]  Kenneth A. Pier Locator technology in distributed systems: the Active Badge , 1991, COCS '91.

[10]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment , 1993, CACM.

[11]  Alan Borning,et al.  Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks , 1991, CHI.

[12]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Applying cryptographic techniques to problems in media space security , 1995, COCS '95.

[13]  Owen Daly-Jones,et al.  Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it? , 1994, CHI '94.

[14]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Low disturbance audio for awareness and privacy in media space applications , 1995, MULTIMEDIA '95.

[15]  John C. Tang,et al.  Montage: providing teleproximity for distributed groups , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[16]  Austin Henderson,et al.  A room of our own: experiences from a direct office share , 1994, CHI 1994.

[17]  Mike Phillips,et al.  Media space , 1998, Digit. Creativity.

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system , 1992, CHI.

[19]  Ron Frederick,et al.  Experiences With Real-Time Software Video Compression , 1994 .

[20]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Video as a technology for informal communication , 1993, CACM.

[21]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.