An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand

Abstract A methodology for the assessment of the seismic energy demands imposed on structures is proposed. The research was carried out through two consecutive phases. Inelastic design input energy spectra for systems with a prescribed displacement ductility ratio were first developed. The study of the inelastic behavior of energy factors and the evaluation of the response modification in comparison with the elastic case were performed by introducing two new parameters, namely: (1) the Response Modification Factor of the earthquake input energy (RE), representing the ratio of the elastic to inelastic input energy spectral values and (2) the ratio α of the area enclosed by the inelastic input energy spectrum in the range of periods between 0.05 and 4.0 s to the corresponding elastic value. The proposed design inelastic energy spectra, resulting from the study of a large set of strong motion records, were obtained as a function of ductility, soil type, source-to-site distance and magnitude. Subsequently, with reference to single degree of freedom systems, the spectra of the hysteretic to input energy ratio were evaluated, for different soil types and target ductility ratios. These spectra, defined to evaluate the hysteretic energy demand of structures, were described by a piecewise linear idealization that allows to distinguish three distinct regions as a function of the vibration period. In this manner, once the inelastic design input energy spectra were determined, the definition of the energy dissipated by means of inelastic deformations followed directly from the knowledge of hysteretic to input energy ratio. The design spectra of both input energy and hysteretic to input energy ratio were defined considering an elasto-plastic behavior. Nevertheless, other constitutive models were taken into account for comparison purposes.

[1]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  THE N2 METHOD FOR THE SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS , 1996 .

[2]  Alphan Nurtuǧ,et al.  Earthquake ground motion characteristics and seismic energy dissipation , 1995 .

[3]  Amador Teran-Gilmore,et al.  A Parametric Approach to Performance-Based Numerical Seismic Design , 1998 .

[4]  Fabrizio Mollaioli,et al.  Formulation of elastic earthquake input energy spectra , 1998 .

[5]  T. Takeda,et al.  Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakes , 1970 .

[6]  H Krawinkler,et al.  IMPACT OF DURATION/ENERGY IN DESIGN , 1997 .

[7]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes , 1959 .

[8]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Seismic demand in medium‐ and long‐period structures , 1989 .

[9]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[10]  R. Clough Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements , 1966 .

[11]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings , 1992 .

[12]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Limit Design of Structures to Resist Earthquakes , 1956 .

[13]  C. Uang,et al.  Evaluation of seismic energy in structures , 1990 .

[14]  Theodore V. Galambos,et al.  Earthquake Load for Structural Reliability , 1989 .

[15]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Earthquake Energy Absorption in SDOF Structures , 1984 .

[16]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings , 1985 .

[17]  J B Mander,et al.  HOW CAN ENERGY BASED SEISMIC DESIGN BE ACCOMMODATED IN SEISMIC MAPPING , 1997 .

[18]  Y. H. Chai,et al.  Formulation of Duration-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectrum , 1998 .

[19]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Members , 1987 .

[20]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy , 1994 .