The influence of sex differences and individual task performance on brain activation during planning

Several studies have attempted to identify the neuronal basis of sex differences in cognition. However, group differences in cognitive ability rather than genuine neurocognitive differences between the sexes may account for their results. Here, we compare with functional magnetic resonance imaging the relation between gender, individual task performance, and planning-related brain activation. Men and women preselected to display identical performance scores showed a strong relation between individual task performance and activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortex activation during a visuospatial planning task. No gender-specific activations were found. However, a different pattern emerged when subjects had to execute the motor responses to the problems. Better performance was associated with right dorsolateral prefrontal and right parahippocampal activations, and females exhibited a stronger right hippocampal activation than males. These findings underline that an individual's performance level rather than his or her sex largely determines the neuronal activation patterns during higher-level cognition.

[1]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain II Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Parietal Asymmetry in Visuospatial Imagery , 2002, Neuron.

[2]  T. Wüstenberg,et al.  Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  A. Lundervold,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task. , 2000, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[4]  B. Turetsky,et al.  An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task , 2000, Brain and Language.

[5]  D. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in intelligence. Implications for education. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[6]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[7]  R. Goebel,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain I Time-Resolved fMRI during Visuospatial Mental Imagery , 2002, Neuron.

[8]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Frontostriatal system in planning complexity: a parametric functional magnetic resonance version of tower of london task , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  K I Bolla,et al.  Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published May 13, 2004 Sex-related Differences in a Gambling Task and Its Neurological Correlates , 2022 .

[10]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of mental rotation and memory scanning: a multidimensional scaling analysis of brain activation patterns 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 24 February 1998. 1 , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  J. Unterrainer,et al.  When planning fails: individual differences and error-related brain activity in problem solving. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  A. Dagher,et al.  Mapping the network for planning: a correlational PET activation study with the Tower of London task. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[17]  D. Kimura Sex differences in the brain. , 1992, Scientific American.

[18]  Ulrich Schall,et al.  Functional brain maps of Tower of London performance: a positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Hiscock,et al.  Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. , 1994 .

[20]  S. Golaszewski,et al.  Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  Wolfgang Staffen,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Visuospatial Processing: Is It Primarily Gender-Related or Due to Quality of Performance? , 2000, Neuropsychobiology.

[22]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[24]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[25]  F Barkhof,et al.  Visualizing brain activation during planning: the tower of London test adapted for functional MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET , 1993, Nature.