The Structure of Firm R&D, the Factor Intensity of Production, and Skill Bias

This paper explores the effect of research and development (R&D) and capital on factor intensity and skill bias in a sample of manufacturing plants. Firm and industry R&D as well as plant level capital increase the factor intensity of labor over materials. In contrast, skill bias originates in portions of capital and R&D. Equipment capital and firm R&D in the same product as a plant are consistently skill biased, while structures are biased against skill. Furthermore, general firm and industry R&D increase investment in equipment but not structures. This shows that the skill bias of R&D occurs through two distinct channels. First, firm R&D specific to the product increases the relative demand for skilled labor directly and in the short run through the cost function. Second, general firm and industry R&D exert an additional skill bias by favoring equipment over structures in the long run, demonstrating the broader compass of the skill bias of R&D over time.

[1]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: an Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality , 1986 .

[2]  John Bound,et al.  Changes in the Structure of Wages During the 1980&Apos;S: an Evaluation of Alternative Explanations , 1989, The American economic review.

[3]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants , 1992 .

[4]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[5]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U. S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures , 1994 .

[6]  W. Gray,et al.  The NBER Manufacturing Productivity Database , 1996 .

[7]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[8]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries , 1988 .

[9]  B. Baltagi,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Panel Data , 2020, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[10]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[11]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[12]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Capital-Skill Complementarity , 1969 .

[13]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[14]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Private and Social Returns to Research and Development , 1996 .

[15]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  J. Bound,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF SKILL-BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE* ELI BERMAN , 1998 .

[17]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[18]  F. Lichtenberg.  Corporate Takeovers and Productivity , 1992 .

[19]  T. Klette.  R&D, Scope Economies, and Plant Performance , 1996 .

[20]  M. McElroy.  Additive General Error Models for Production, Cost, and Derived Demand or Share Systems , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology , 1987 .

[22]  M. Boozer.  Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Badi H. Baltagi Wiley, 1995 , 1997, Econometric Theory.

[23]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .