Varying Femoral Tunnels between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions

Background Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. Hypothesis A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N·m valgus and 5-N·m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied. Results At 30° of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 ± 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 ± 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 ± 3.7 mm; P <. 05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 ± 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 ± 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 ± 5.2 mm; P <. 05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions. Conclusion Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. Clinical Relevance Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

[1]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement: Comparison of insertion site anatomy with the guidelines of a computer-assisted surgical system. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement with an active robotic system: a cadaveric study. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  E. L. Cain,et al.  Anatomic endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patella tendon autograft. , 2002, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[4]  K. Markolf,et al.  Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Hamstrings and Patellar Tendon: A Cadaveric Study Comparing Anterior Tibial and Rotational Loads , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  M Sati,et al.  Real-time computerized in situ guidance system for ACL graft placement. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[9]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Current Opinion on Computer-Aided Surgical Navigation and Robotics , 2002, Sports medicine.

[10]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Position of the Tibia during Graft Fixation Affects Knee Kinematics and Graft Forces for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  R J Johnson,et al.  The Elongation Behavior of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft in Vivo , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  A Burkart,et al.  Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[13]  A. A. Amis,et al.  A comparative study of ’isometric’ points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment , 2001, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knee , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Image Guided and Robotic Assistive Technologies , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  S A Banks,et al.  Computer Assistance in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  A. A. Amis,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting , 1998, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  M. Bernard,et al.  Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. , 1997, The American journal of knee surgery.

[19]  H Fujie,et al.  Forces and moments in six-DOF at the human knee joint: mathematical description for control. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  G A Livesay,et al.  A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Computer Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: First Clinical Tests , 1995, CVRMed.

[22]  J. Irrgang,et al.  Loss of Motion Following Knee Ligament Reconstruction , 1995, Sports medicine.

[23]  H Fujie,et al.  Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. , 1995, Annals of biomedical engineering.

[24]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Computer-Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: First Clinical Tests , 1995 .

[25]  B. Beynnon,et al.  The Relationship Between Anterior-Posterior Knee Laxity and the Structural Properties of the Patellar Tendon Graft , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  S Arai,et al.  The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  K. H. Chan,et al.  Ligament tension pattern in the flexed knee in combined passive anterior translation and axial rotation , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  N F Friederich,et al.  [Clinical application of biomechanic and functional anatomical findings of the knee joint]. , 1992, Der Orthopade.

[29]  K. Markolf,et al.  Direct measurement of resultant forces in the anterior cruciate ligament. An in vitro study performed with a new experimental technique. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  E S Grood,et al.  Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  J A Sidles,et al.  Ligament length relationships in the moving knee , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.