ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities

Abstract The development of a new scale, ENTRE-U, that measures the entrepreneurial orientation of university departments is described. Governments, industry, and funding organizations challenge universities to become more "entrepreneurial", often in the context of increasing the commercialization outcomes of publicly funded research. The extant literature on corporate entrepreneurial orientation (EO) suggests this orientation is beneficial when organizations face dynamic or hostile environments. However, the EO concept and related empirical research focus on firms in competitive markets. Little is known about the nature of EO in other organizational contexts. ENTRE-U was developed to facilitate empirical research on EO within public universities. Interviews and a follow-up focus group with faculty members from departments in computer science, health science, and engineering at Canadian Universities elicited items for the new scale. A survey of university department heads provided data for statistical development of the scale. ENTRE-U consists of four dimensions – research mobilization, unconventionality, industry collaboration, and perception of university policies – that successfully predict department involvement in commercialization activities. Implications of the findings and opportunities for research using the ENTRE-U scale are discussed.

[1]  J. Linton.  Technology innovation management's growing influence and impact , 2009 .

[2]  Dawn H. Pearcy,et al.  Four Subtle Sins in Scale Development: Some Suggestions for Strengthening the Current Paradigm , 2001 .

[3]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[4]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[5]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[6]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[7]  Harald Bathelt,et al.  A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development , 2010 .

[8]  M. Lerner,et al.  Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research , 2003 .

[9]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .

[10]  S. West,et al.  A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  Helen Mitchell,et al.  Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface , 1994 .

[12]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university , 2008 .

[13]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[14]  David H. Hsu,et al.  Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT , 2007 .

[15]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada , 2008 .

[16]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  A paradigm for examining second-order factor models employing structural equation modeling , 2009 .

[17]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework , 1997 .

[18]  N. Baldini,et al.  Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy , 2010 .

[19]  Debasish N. Mallick,et al.  Technology Management Education in MBA Programs: A Comparative Study of Knowledge and Skill Requirements , 2000 .

[20]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle , 2001 .

[21]  George T. Solomon,et al.  Trends in Small Business Management and Entrepreneurship Education in the United States , 1991 .

[22]  Frank Mueller,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCES AS STRATEGIC ASSETS: AN EVOLUTIONARY RESOURCE‐BASED THEORY* , 1996 .

[23]  I. Chow.  The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in China , 2006 .

[24]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[25]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[26]  Johan Wiklund.  The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation—Performance Relationship , 1999 .

[27]  Peter Rainsford.  The small business institute: Hands-on learning , 1992 .

[28]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms , 1987 .

[29]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[30]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[31]  P. Khandwalla.  The design of organizations , 1977 .

[32]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[33]  How do technology innovation management journals stack up against the Financial Times 45 – Impressively – and other notes , 2010 .

[34]  Danny P. Soetanto,et al.  Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth , 2009 .

[35]  David N. Allen,et al.  Structure, Policy, Services, and Performance in the Business Incubator Industry , 1991 .

[36]  K. Widaman.  Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 1985 .

[37]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Implementation research: state of the art and future directions , 2002 .

[38]  A. Nahavandi,et al.  The Impact of Consulting on Small Business: A Further Examination , 1988 .

[39]  Karel J. Samsom,et al.  University scientists as entrepreneurs: a special case of technology transfer and high-tech venturing , 1993 .

[40]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Knowledge mobilisation in communities through socio-technical systems , 2007 .

[41]  T. R. Kramer,et al.  Effects of managers' entrepreneurial behavior on subordinates , 1997 .

[42]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[43]  R. McNaughton,et al.  Making University Departments More Entrepreneurial , 2005 .

[44]  Richard C. Box.  Running Government Like a Business , 1999 .

[45]  J. Casillas,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of SMEs: A Causal Model , 2008 .

[46]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[47]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms , 1996 .

[48]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Designing Contracts for University Spin-Offs , 2008 .

[49]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[50]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[51]  Paul D. Guild,et al.  Commercializing inventions resulting from university research: Analyzing the impact of technology characteristics on subsequent business models , 2011 .

[52]  Fredric Kropp,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and international entrepreneurial business venture startup , 2008 .

[53]  D. Hambrick.  Strategic Awareness Within Top Management Teams. , 1980 .

[54]  K. J. Samsom.  A longitudinal study of success and failure among scientist-started ventures , 2010 .

[55]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship. Social Norms, University Culture and Policies , 2007 .

[56]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[57]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[58]  Gary A. Knight,et al.  Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation , 1997 .

[59]  Sarfraz A. Mian.  US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance , 1994 .

[60]  B. Thompson.  Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications , 2004 .

[61]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  UNIVERSITY-BASED TECHNOLOGY LICENSING IN THE KNOWLEDGE BASED ECONOMY , 1998 .

[62]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Introduction to the Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[63]  P. Khandwalla.  Pioneering Innovative Management: An Indian Excellence , 1985 .

[64]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[65]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms , 2007 .

[66]  Michael G. Goldsby,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurs or Rogue Middle Managers? A Framework for Ethical Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[67]  M. Bray,et al.  University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions , 2000 .

[68]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  The Relationship between Marketing Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation , 1991 .

[69]  E. Gigliotti.  Discovering Statistics Using spss. Second Edition , 2007 .

[70]  W. Velicer,et al.  Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[71]  Georges Romme,et al.  Creating University Spinoffs : A Science-Based Design Perspective , 2009 .

[72]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: The Case of the Public Sector , 1999 .

[73]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[74]  S. Baron,et al.  ONLINE SURVEYS IN MARKETING RESEARCH: PROS AND CONS , 2002 .

[75]  Fiona Tilley,et al.  HEI and SME linkages: Recommendations for the Future , 1999 .

[76]  R. Becherer,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Environmental Variables on the Entrepreneurial and Marketing Orientation of Entrepreneur-led Firms , 1997 .

[77]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Spin-offs from research centers at a research university☆ , 2000 .

[78]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[79]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[80]  Igor Prodan,et al.  CONCEPTUALIZING ACADEMIC-ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS: AN EMPIRICAL TEST. , 2008 .

[81]  C. Friedrich,et al.  Is Entrepreneurial Education at South African Universities Successful? , 2007 .

[82]  B. Levin.  Thinking About Knowledge Mobilization A discussion paper prepared at the request of the Canadian Council on Learning and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council , 2008 .

[83]  Max Coulthard.  THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION ON FIRM PERFORMANCE AND THE POTENTIAL INFLUENCE OF RELATIONAL DYNAMISM , 2007 .

[84]  S. Baron,et al.  Online Surveys in Marketing Research , 2002 .

[85]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[86]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university‐industry relationships , 1994 .

[87]  O. Richard,et al.  CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN MANAGEMENT, FIRM PERFORMANCE, AND THE MODERATING ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION DIMENSIONS , 2004 .

[88]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[89]  A. Caruana,et al.  Effects of some Environmental Challenges and Centralization on the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Public Sector Entities , 2002 .

[90]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[91]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia , 1996 .

[92]  Arie Rip,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems and the Advent of Strategic Science , 2002 .

[93]  Fred Pries,et al.  ‘Repeat commercializers,’ the ‘habitual entrepreneurs’ of university–industry technology transfer , 2009 .

[94]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[95]  William H. A. Johnson.  Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn , 2008 .

[96]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation , 2000 .

[97]  Teresa Joyce Covin,et al.  Competitive Aggressiveness, Environmental Context, and Small Firm Performance , 1990 .

[98]  T. Allen,et al.  Delineating the Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial University: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Experience , 2007 .

[99]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies , 2001 .

[100]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[101]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Taking the ivory from the tower to coat the economic world: Regional strategies to make science useful , 2010 .

[102]  Nichaya Suntornpithug,et al.  THE MULTI-DIMENSIONAL NATURE OF UNIVERSITY INCUBATORS: CAPABILITY/RESOURCE EMPHASIS PHASES , 2008 .

[103]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[104]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .