Modelling Workflows for More-than-Human Design: Prosthetic Habitats for the Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua)

Anthropogenic degradation of the environment is pervasive and expanding. Human construction activities destroy or damage habitats of nonhuman lifeforms. In many cases, artificial replacement habitats become necessary. However, designing for the needs and preferences of nonhuman lifeforms is challenging. Established workflows for this type of designing do not exist. This paper hypothesises that a multi-scale modelling approach can support inclusive, more-than-human design. The case-study project tests this approach by applying computational modelling to the design of prosthetic habitats for the powerful owl (Ninox strenua). The proposed approach simulates owls’ perception of the city based on scientific evidence. The tools include algorithmic mapping, 3D-scanning, generative modelling, digital fabrication and augmented-reality assembly. Outcomes establish techniques for urban-scale planning, site selection, tree-scale fitting, and nest-scale form-making. The findings demonstrate that computational modelling can (1) inform more-than-human design and (2) guide scientific data collection for more inclusive ecosystem management.

[1]  K. Buchanan,et al.  Nest box design for a changing climate: The value of improved insulation , 2018 .

[2]  D. Ierodiaconou,et al.  Does urbanization have the potential to create an ecological trap for powerful owls (Ninox strenua) , 2014 .

[3]  Jim Greenwood,et al.  A Powerful Owl Disperses into Town and Uses an Artificial Nest-box , 2011 .

[4]  E. McNabb Observations on the Biology of the Powerful Owl Ninox strenua in Southern Victoria , 1996 .

[5]  R. Wallis,et al.  Short Communication: Diet, Roosts and Breeding of Powerful Owls Ninox strenua in a Disturbed, Urban Environment: a Case for Cannibalism? Or a Case of Infanticide? , 1999 .

[6]  John G. White,et al.  Species distribution models derived from citizen science data predict the fine scale movements of owls in an urbanizing landscape , 2017 .

[7]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Reduced availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes: Implications for policy and practice , 2014 .

[8]  R. Goldingay,et al.  Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats , 2009 .

[9]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia , 2002 .

[10]  John G. White,et al.  Joining the dots: How does an apex predator move through an urbanizing landscape? , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[11]  Anthony R. Rendall,et al.  Can owls be used to monitor the impacts of urbanisation? A cautionary tale of variable detection , 2017, Wildlife Research.

[12]  F. Hogan,et al.  Insights into the breeding behaviour and dispersal of the Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua) through the collection of shed feathers , 2010 .

[13]  John G. White,et al.  Urbanization and Raptors: Trends and Research Approaches , 2018 .