The signal-cognition interface: interactions between degraded auditory signals and cognitive processes.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Lidestam. Visual discrimination of vowel duration. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[2] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognition and hearing aids. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[3] E. T. Auer. Spoken word recognition by eye. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[4] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[5] J. Obleser,et al. Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] Mounya Elhilali,et al. A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Mark D'Esposito,et al. Repetition Suppression and Reactivation in Auditory–Verbal Short-Term Recognition Memory , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[8] Ruth Campbell,et al. The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[9] Roy D Patterson,et al. Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[10] D. Poeppel,et al. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[11] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing , 2008, Cognitive Processing.
[12] Nima Mesgarani,et al. Phoneme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R. Näätänen. Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of central auditory system plasticity , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[14] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[15] S. Stenfelt. Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: A modelling approach , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[16] T. Lunner,et al. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[17] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[18] L. Nyberg,et al. Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[19] L. Bernstein,et al. Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[20] Jae Hee Lee,et al. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] F. Craik. The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[22] Thomas Lunner,et al. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[23] Thomas Lunner,et al. Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[24] Tammo Houtgast,et al. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[25] Brent Edwards,et al. The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.
[26] Ewen MacDonald,et al. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging , 2007, Hearing Research.
[27] A. Wingfield,et al. Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.
[28] Ray Meddis,et al. Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[30] S. Scollie,et al. The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[31] Brian C J Moore,et al. New Version of the TEN Test With Calibrations in dB HL , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[32] P. Tallal. Improving language and literacy is a matter of time , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[33] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Neural correlates of working memory for sign language. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[34] R. A. Schmiedt,et al. Metabolic Presbycusis: Differential Changes in Auditory Brainstem and Otoacoustic Emission Responses with Chronic Furosemide Application in the Gerbil , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[35] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] Stefan Stenfelt,et al. Three-Dimensional Stapes Footplate Motion in Human Temporal Bones , 2003, Audiology and Neurotology.
[37] S. Scott,et al. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.
[38] M. Sachs,et al. An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension , 2003 .
[40] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[41] J. Rönnberg. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[42] R. A. Schmiedt,et al. Effects of Furosemide Applied Chronically to the Round Window: A Model of Metabolic Presbyacusis , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[43] Ulf Andersson,et al. Deterioration of the phonological processing skills in adults with an acquired severe hearing loss , 2002 .
[44] B. Moore,et al. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] L. Robles,et al. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.
[46] B. Moore. Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, Perceptual Consequences, and Implications for the Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2001, Trends in amplification.
[47] M. Daneman,et al. A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension , 2001 .
[48] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[49] J. Risberg,et al. The cognitive neuroscience of signed language. , 2000, Acta psychologica.
[50] A. Baddeley. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[51] B C Moore,et al. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[52] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[53] J Rönnberg,et al. Signed and spoken language perception studied by positron emission tomography , 1997, Neurology.
[54] E. Boer. Classical and non-classical models of the cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] P Dallos,et al. Stereocilia displacement induced somatic motility of cochlear outer hair cells. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[56] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[57] H. Schuknecht,et al. Cochlear Pathology in Presbycusis , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[58] J. Rönnberg,et al. Visual speech processing: word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[59] U Rosenhall,et al. Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[60] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[61] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Cognitive and communicative function : The effects of chronological age and "handicap age" , 1990 .
[62] R Meddis,et al. Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: further studies. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] B. Moore,et al. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] W. Marslen-Wilson. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.
[65] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[66] Richard F. Lyon,et al. A computational model of filtering, detection, and compression in the cochlea , 1982, ICASSP.
[67] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .
[68] F Grosjean,et al. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[69] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[70] E. Shaw. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[71] T. Lunner,et al. Good cognitive resources make listening under challenging conditions seem less effortful. , 2009 .
[72] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing , 2008 .
[73] P. Tallal,et al. Generalization of non-linguistic auditory perceptual training to syllable discrimination. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.
[74] Lee M. Miller,et al. Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.
[75] L. Carney,et al. A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[76] R. Patterson,et al. Complex Sounds and Auditory Images , 1992 .
[77] B. Moore,et al. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[78] S. Scott,et al. Functional Integration across Brain Regions Improves Speech Perception under Adverse Listening Conditions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.