Season and preterm birth in Norway: A cautionary tale.

BACKGROUND Preterm birth is a common, costly and dangerous pregnancy complication. Seasonality of risk would suggest modifiable causes. METHODS We examine seasonal effects on preterm birth, using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (2,321,652 births), and show that results based on births are misleading and a fetuses-at-risk approach is essential. In our harmonic-regression Cox proportional hazards model we consider fetal risk of birth between 22 and 37 completed weeks of gestation. We examine effects of both day of year of conception (for early effects) and day of ongoing gestation (for seasonal effects on labour onset) as modifiers of gestational-age-based risk. RESULTS Naïve analysis of preterm rates across days of birth shows compelling evidence for seasonality (P < 10(-152)). However, the reconstructed numbers of conceptions also vary with season (P < 10(-307)), confounding results by inducing seasonal variation in the age distribution of the fetal population at risk. When we instead properly treat fetuses as the individuals at risk, restrict analysis to pregnancies with relatively accurate ultrasound-based assessment of gestational age (available since 1998) and adjust for socio-demographic factors and maternal smoking, we find modest effects of both time of year of conception and time of year at risk, with peaks for early preterm near early January and early July. CONCLUSIONS Analyses of seasonal effects on preterm birth are demonstrably vulnerable to confounding by seasonality of conception, measurement error in conception dating, and socio-demographic factors. The seasonal variation based on fetuses reveals two peaks for early preterm, coinciding with New Year's Day and the early July beginning of Norway's summer break, and may simply reflect a holiday-related pattern of unintended conception.

[1]  Alison D. Gernand,et al.  Maternal vitamin D status and spontaneous preterm birth by placental histology in the US Collaborative Perinatal Project. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Jun Wu,et al.  Associations of Meteorology with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Preeclampsia, Preterm Birth and Birth Weight , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Preterm birth–associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010 , 2013, Pediatric Research.

[4]  Ann-Beth Moller,et al.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications , 2012, The Lancet.

[5]  L. Darrow Invited commentary: application of case-crossover methods to investigate triggers of preterm birth. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  L. Waller,et al.  Seasonality of Birth and Implications for Temporal Studies of Preterm Birth , 2009, Epidemiology.

[7]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[8]  N. Cox Speaking Stata: In Praise of Trigonometric Predictors , 2006 .

[9]  A. Andersen,et al.  Alcohol consumption during pregnancy and the risk of preterm delivery. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  P. Albert,et al.  Parametric and semiparametric approaches to testing for seasonal trend in serial count data. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[11]  L. Irgens,et al.  The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  H. Gjessing,et al.  Birthweight by gestational age in Norway , 2000, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  Bernard D. Flury,et al.  PERIODIC LOGISTIC REGRESSION , 1999 .

[14]  T. Holford,et al.  Estimating age, period and cohort effects using the multistage model for cancer. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.