Rationale and design of the BRAVERY study (EPOC1701): a multicentre phase II study of eribulin in patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Background BRAF V600E mutations are associated with aggressive biology and limited response to standard chemotherapy, especially during second-line and beyond therapies. BRAF V600E mutant and wild-type colorectal cancers (CRCs) differ in their expression profiles, and preclinical evidence suggests that microtubule inhibitors have an antitumour effect on xenograft models of BRAF V600E mutant CRCs. Eribulin has the best growth inhibitory activity in vitro of the microtubule inhibitors. Also, we have evidenced a hint of activity for patients with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) with tumour shrinkage following eribulin treatment. Trial design The BRAVERY study is a multicentre phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with BRAF V600E mutant mCRC detected in either tumour tissues (primary analysis part) or circulating tumour DNA assays (liquid biopsy part). Key eligibility criteria are refractoriness and intolerance to at least one regimen (including irinotecan or oxaliplatin) containing fluoropyrimidine and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Eribulin is to be administered intravenously at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator’s assessment. We calculated the sample size of the primary analysis part at 27 patients using a two-stage design with 25% ORR deemed promising and 5% unacceptable (one-sided α, 0.05; β, 0.1). Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Moreover, we will collect pretreated tissue and serial blood samples for biomarker analyses, focusing on gene expression associated with BRAF mutant-like CRC to find predictive markers and acquired gene alterations to detect resistance mechanisms to eribulin. We initiated patient enrolment in March 2018, completed the primary analysis on May 2019, and are currently continuing with the liquid biopsy part. Trial registration number UMIN000031221 and 000031552.

[1]  K. Muro,et al.  Eribulin in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: case series and potential rationale. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  J. Wason,et al.  Two-stage phase II oncology designs using short-term endpoints for early stopping , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  P. Quirke,et al.  Investigating the poor outcomes of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer: analysis from 2530 patients in randomised clinical trials , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  M. Ando,et al.  Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  R. Bernards,et al.  A Vulnerability of a Subset of Colon Cancers with Potential Clinical Utility , 2016, Cell.

[6]  B. Kermani,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Digital Sequencing Panel for Quantitative, Highly Accurate Evaluation of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  G. Fontanini,et al.  FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  Clinical impact of expanded BRAF mutational status on the outcome for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with anti-EGFR antibody: An analysis of the BREAC trial (Biomarker Research for Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer Genomics). , 2015 .

[9]  Hartmut Link,et al.  FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  M. Tzardi,et al.  BRAFV600E Mutation Analysis in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in Daily Clinical Practice: Correlations with Clinical Characteristics, and Its Impact on Patients’ Outcome , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  P. Gibbs,et al.  PIK3CA, BRAF, and PTEN Status and Benefit from Cetuximab in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer—Results from NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17 , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  Albert C. Koong,et al.  BRAF-mutated, Microsatellite-stable Adenocarcinoma of the Proximal Colon: An Aggressive Adenocarcinoma With Poor Survival, Mucinous Differentiation, and Adverse Morphologic Features , 2012, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[13]  Y. Yatabe,et al.  BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  陆星华,et al.  Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Melvin J. Yu,et al.  In vitro and in vivo anticancer activities of synthetic macrocyclic ketone analogues of halichondrin B. , 2001, Cancer research.

[16]  P. Simmonds,et al.  Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.