Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients

Right hemisphere-damaged (RHD) and left hemisphere-damaged (LHD) aphasic patients were tested on a nonverbal cartoon completion task that included a humorous (Joke) and a nonhumorous (Story) condition. In both conditions, RHD patients performed worse than LHD patients. More importantly, the qualitative difference between the errors produced by the two groups suggests that right and left hemisphere brain damage impairs different components of narrative ability. RHD patients showed a preserved sensitivity to the surprise element of humor, and a diminished ability to establish coherence. Conversely, LHD patients, when they erred, showed an impaired sensitivity to the surprise element of humor, and a preserved ability to establish coherence by integrating content across parts of a narrative. These results suggest that the observed humor comprehension deficits of RHD patients result specifically from right hemisphere disease and not from brain damage irrespective of locus. The performances of the RHD and LHD patients groups together support a separation of narrative ability from the traditional aspects of language ability typically disrupted in aphasia.

[1]  Jerry Suls,et al.  A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons , 1972 .

[2]  Craig W. Linebaugh,et al.  Comprehension of Idiomatic Expressions by Right-Hemisphere-Damaged Adults , 1981 .

[3]  A. J. North,et al.  Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia , 1981, Brain and Language.

[4]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[5]  H. Gardner,et al.  9 – Missing the Point: The Role of the Right Hemisphere in the Processing of Complex Linguistic Materials1 , 1983 .

[6]  T. Shultz A Cognitive-Developmental Analysis of Humour , 1976 .

[7]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[8]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[10]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.

[11]  O L Zangwill,et al.  Ideation in aphasia: the picture-story method. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  N. Foldi,et al.  Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[13]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[14]  William Hirst,et al.  Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology , 1984, Brain and Language.

[15]  Walter Huber,et al.  Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia , 1982, Brain and Language.