Ghost imaging enhancement for detections of the low-transmittance objects

The underwater environment is extremely complex and variable, which makes it difficult for underwater robots detecting or recognizing surroundings using images acquired with cameras. Ghost imaging as a new imaging technique has attracted much attention due to its special physical properties and potential for imaging of objects in optically harsh or noisy environments. In this work, we experimentally study three categories of image reconstruction methods of ghost imaging for objects of different transmittance. For high-transmittance objects, the differential ghost imaging is more efficient than traditional ghost imaging. However, for low-transmittance objects, the reconstructed images using traditional ghost imaging and differential ghost imaging algorithms are both exceedingly blurred and cannot be improved by increasing the number of measurements. A compressive sensing method named augmented Lagrangian and alternating direction algorithm (TVAL3) is proposed to reduce the background noise imposed by the low-transmittance. Experimental results show that compressive ghost imaging can dramatically subtract the background noise and enhance the contrast of the image. The relationship between the quality of the reconstructed image and the complexity of object itself is also discussed.

[1]  Hamid Latifi,et al.  Compressive ghost imaging in the presence of environmental noise , 2019, Optics Communications.

[2]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[3]  Lin Ma,et al.  Performance analysis of compressive ghost imaging based on different signal reconstruction techniques. , 2015, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Chengbo Li An efficient algorithm for total variation regularization with applications to the single pixel camera and compressive sensing , 2010 .

[5]  Jing Wen,et al.  Plasmonic Holographic Metasurfaces for Generation of Vector Optical Beams , 2017, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[6]  Shih,et al.  Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[7]  K. Tamasaku,et al.  Ghost Imaging with Paired X-ray Photons , 2018, 2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[8]  B. Erkmen Computational ghost imaging for remote sensing. , 2012, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  LinLin Shen,et al.  Visual-Patch-Attention-Aware Saliency Detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[10]  Wenlin Gong,et al.  Ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraints , 2012, 1203.3835.

[11]  Yanhua Shih,et al.  Virtual ghost imaging through turbulence and obscurants using Bessel beam illumination , 2012 .

[12]  Yanfeng Bai,et al.  Ghost imaging for a reflected object with a rough surface , 2010 .

[13]  R. Boyd,et al.  "Two-Photon" coincidence imaging with a classical source. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  E Tajahuerce,et al.  Compressive imaging in scattering media. , 2015, Optics express.

[15]  Daniele Pelliccia,et al.  Practical X-ray Ghost Imaging , 2018, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[16]  Ying Zhang,et al.  High-visibility underwater ghost imaging in low illumination , 2019, Optics Communications.

[17]  Wen Chen Single-Shot Imaging Without Reference Wave Using Binary Intensity Pattern for Optically-Secured-Based Correlation , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[18]  Jun Xiong,et al.  Wavelength-multiplexing ghost imaging , 2015 .

[19]  Kenneth Baldwin,et al.  Ghost imaging with atoms , 2016, Nature.

[20]  Y. Shih,et al.  Turbulence-free ghost imaging , 2011 .

[21]  O. Katz,et al.  Ghost imaging with a single detector , 2008, 0812.2633.

[22]  Enrong Li,et al.  Structured image reconstruction for three-dimensional ghost imaging lidar. , 2015, Optics express.

[23]  Yilong Yin,et al.  The extended marine underwater environment database and baseline evaluations , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  Wenlin Gong,et al.  Ghost Imaging Lidar via Sparsity Constraints in Real Atmosphere , 2013 .

[25]  Yanfeng Bai,et al.  Experimental investigation of ghost imaging of reflective objects with different surface roughness , 2017 .

[26]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Table-top X-ray Ghost Imaging with Ultra-Low Radiation , 2017 .

[27]  Yilong Yin,et al.  Integrating QDWD with pattern distinctness and local contrast for underwater saliency detection , 2018, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[28]  Wen-Kai Yu,et al.  Single-photon compressive imaging with some performance benefits over raster scanning , 2014 .

[29]  A. Gatti,et al.  Differential ghost imaging. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[30]  Zhuo Xu,et al.  Underwater computational ghost imaging. , 2017, Optics express.

[31]  O. Katz,et al.  Compressive ghost imaging , 2009, 0905.0321.