Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton–top tamarins

Although animals of many species have been shown to discriminate between visual–spatial arrays or auditory–temporal sequences based on numerosity, most of the evidence for numerosity discrimination derives from experiments involving extensive laboratory training. Under these conditions, animals' discrimination of two numerosities depends on their ratio and is independent of their absolute value. It is an open question whether any untrained non–human animal spontaneously represents number in this way, as do human children and adults. We present the results of familiarization–discrimination experiments on cotton–top tamarin monkeys (Saguinus oedipus) that provide evidence for numerosity discrimination in the absence of training. Presented with auditory stimuli (speech syllables) controlled for the continuous variables of sequence duration, item duration, inter–stimulus interval and overall energy, tamarins readily discriminated sequences of 4 versus 8, 4 versus 6, and 8 versus 12 syllables. By contrast, tamarins failed to discriminate sequences of 4 versus 5 and 8 versus 10 syllables, providing evidence that their numerosity discrimination is approximate and shows the ratio signature of numerosity discrimination in humans and trained non–human animals. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that representations of large, approximate numerosity are evolutionarily ancient and spontaneously available to non–human animals.

[1]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Principles of Animal Cognition , 1997 .

[4]  B. Scholl,et al.  Explaining the infant''s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy , 1999 .

[5]  J. Call,et al.  Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  C Uller,et al.  Spontaneous representation of number in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[9]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[10]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Numerical representations in primates. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[13]  M. Beran Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[14]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[15]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[16]  M. Hauser Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think , 2000 .

[17]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[18]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). , 1997 .

[19]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  The Development of numerical competence : animal and human models , 1993 .

[20]  Susan Carey,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis , 2001 .

[21]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Segmenting a continuous acoustic speech stream: Serial learning in cotton-top tamarin monkeys , 2001 .

[23]  M. Hauser,et al.  The production and perception of long calls by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): acoustic analyses and playback experiments. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[25]  Gary Marcus,et al.  Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. , 2002, Cognition.

[26]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[28]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[29]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[31]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[32]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  The evolution and ontogeny of ordinal numerical ability , 2002 .

[33]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Use of numbers by a chimpanzee , 1985, Nature.

[34]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  "Constructive" enumeration by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[36]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  M. Hauser,et al.  Spontaneous number discrimination of multi-format auditory stimuli in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) , 2002, Cognition.

[38]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Counting by chimpanzees and ordinality judgments by macaques in video-formatted tasks. , 1993 .

[39]  W. Roberts,et al.  Pigeons Flexibly Time or Count on Cue , 2000, Psychological science.

[40]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Ordinal Judgments of Numerical Symbols by Macaques (Macaca Mulatta) , 1991, Psychological science.

[41]  F. Ramus,et al.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. , 2000, Science.

[42]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous representations of small numbers of objects by rhesus macaques: Examinations of content and format , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  G. Berntson,et al.  Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[44]  M. Hauser,et al.  Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously subtract? , 2001, Cognition.

[45]  Asif A. Ghazanfar,et al.  The units of perception in the antiphonal calling behavior of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): playback experiments with long calls , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.