Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

BackgroundGrey literature includes a range of documents not controlled by commercial publishing organisations. This means that grey literature can be difficult to search and retrieve for evidence synthesis. Much knowledge and evidence in public health, and other fields, accumulates from innovation in practice. This knowledge may not even be of sufficient formality to meet the definition of grey literature. We term this knowledge ‘grey information’. Grey information may be even harder to search for and retrieve than grey literature.MethodsOn three previous occasions, we have attempted to systematically search for and synthesise public health grey literature and information—both to summarise the extent and nature of particular classes of interventions and to synthesise results of evaluations. Here, we briefly describe these three ‘case studies’ but focus on our post hoc critical reflections on searching for and synthesising grey literature and information garnered from our experiences of these case studies. We believe these reflections will be useful to future researchers working in this area.ResultsIssues discussed include search methods, searching efficiency, replicability of searches, data management, data extraction, assessing study ‘quality’, data synthesis, time and resources, and differentiating evidence synthesis from primary research.ConclusionsInformation on applied public health research questions relating to the nature and range of public health interventions, as well as many evaluations of these interventions, may be predominantly, or only, held in grey literature and grey information. Evidence syntheses on these topics need, therefore, to embrace grey literature and information. Many typical systematic review methods for searching, appraising, managing, and synthesising the evidence base can be adapted for use with grey literature and information. Evidence synthesisers should carefully consider the opportunities and problems offered by including grey literature and information. Enhanced incentives for accurate recording and further methodological developments in retrieval will facilitate future syntheses of grey literature and information.

[1]  A. Edwards,et al.  Efficiency of searching the grey literature in palliative care. , 2001, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[2]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[3]  F. Song,et al.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[4]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[5]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist synthesis - an introduction , 2004 .

[6]  R. Haynes,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  R. Haynes,et al.  Medline : analytical survey scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Optimal search strategies for retrieving , 2004 .

[8]  B. H. Thomas,et al.  A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. , 2004, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[9]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[10]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Jana Bradley,et al.  Modeling public health interventions for improved access to the gray literature. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[13]  K. A. Hayden,et al.  State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature. , 2006, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[14]  Jean Adams,et al.  A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in healthcare settings , 2006, BMC public health.

[15]  S. White,et al.  Critical reflection : a review of contemporary literature and understandings , 2006 .

[16]  Anna H. Perrault,et al.  The Impact of Grey Literature in Advancing Global Karst Research: An Information Needs Assessment for a Globally Distributed Interdisciplinary Community , 2007 .

[17]  M Egger,et al.  Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  J. Higgins,et al.  Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Hude Quan,et al.  An administrative data merging solution for dealing with missing data in a clinical registry: adaptation from ICD-9 to ICD-10 , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[21]  C. Abraham,et al.  A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[22]  L. Tjosvold,et al.  Usefulness of systematic review search strategies in finding child health systematic reviews in MEDLINE. , 2008, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[23]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Studies , 2022 .

[24]  Andrew Cole,et al.  Cancer expert doubts claims about prostate cancer trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  K. Mann,et al.  Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[26]  N. Cavill,et al.  Standard evaluation framework for weight management interventions , 2009 .

[27]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[28]  James Thomas,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .

[29]  David Moher,et al.  An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  Marcus Banks Blog posts and tweets: the next frontier for grey literature , 2009 .

[31]  E. Tacconelli Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[32]  Joachim Schöpfel,et al.  Towards a Prague Definition of Grey Literature , 2010 .

[33]  J. Vergnes,et al.  Ethics in systematic reviews , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[34]  A. Kothari,et al.  Lessons from the business sector for successful knowledge management in health care: A systematic review , 2011, BMC health services research.

[35]  Rebecca Armstrong,et al.  Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[36]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[38]  Cleo Pappas,et al.  Grey Literature: Its Emerging Importance , 2011 .

[39]  N. Hardiker,et al.  Public health interventions and behaviour change: reviewing the grey literature. , 2012, Public health.

[40]  R. Rees Communities that cook: a systematic review of the effectiveness and appropriateness of interventions to introduce adults to home cooking [IOE Research Briefing N°50] , 2013 .

[41]  M. Deverill,et al.  The Do-Well study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic and qualitative process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socio-economically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[42]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[43]  M. Airaksinen,et al.  Automated dose dispensing service for primary healthcare patients: a systematic review , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[44]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[45]  Research Guides: Grey Literature for Health Sciences: Getting Started , 2014 .

[46]  Dwayne Van Eerd,et al.  Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[47]  P. Kearney,et al.  The effect of moderate gestational alcohol consumption during pregnancy on speech and language outcomes in children: a systematic review , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[48]  C. Abraham,et al.  The effectiveness of interventions targeting specific out-of-home food outlets: protocol for a systematic review , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[49]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[50]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  Holger J Schünemann,et al.  Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[52]  Julie Polisena,et al.  Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[53]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[54]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[55]  Charles Abraham,et al.  A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[56]  Greet Cardon,et al.  The effect of a cluster randomised control trial on objectively measured sedentary time and parental reports of time spent in sedentary activities in Belgian preschoolers: the ToyBox-study , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[57]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews , 2017 .