Policy and Information Systems Implementation: the Greek Property Tax Information System Case

This study contributes to the literature on Information Systems (IS) implementation and provides insights into how IS implementation emerges as an assemblage constituted by diverse sociomaterial practices –that is, the intertwining of humans and technology in practice– during the implementation of Greece’s Yearly Property Tax policy and information system over the period 1997–2015. Drawing on the work of Deleuze, Guattari, and Delanda on ‘assemblage theory’ and Burke’s on motive (expressed as ‘intentionality’ and ‘motivation’) we discuss IS implementation as a performative process that is shaped by assemblage agents’ intentionality and motivation and conclude that explicitly attending to these dynamics during the emergence of policy and technology as a sociomaterial assemblage contributes to a better understanding of IS implementation and its success. We propose that higher levels of motivation and intentionality are related to higher chances of successful implementation. Finally, limitations and future research directions are proposed.

[1]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  The social study of ICT: innovation, actors and contexts , 2004 .

[2]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  Social media adoption and use for improved emergency services operations: the case of the NSW SES , 2017, Annals of Operations Research.

[4]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[5]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Tom Butler,et al.  A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems , 2012, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[8]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[9]  Mara Nikolaidou,et al.  From Open Source to Open Innovation practices: A case in the Greek context in light of the debt crisis , 2013 .

[10]  Yulei Zhang,et al.  Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems , 2017, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[11]  K. Burke,et al.  (Nonsymbolic) Motion/(Symbolic) Action , 1978, Critical Inquiry.

[12]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[13]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Governance, risk and compliance: Applications in information systems , 2012, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[14]  Claudio Ciborra,et al.  Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Kathy McGrath,et al.  Power, Rationality, and the Art of Living Through Socio-Technical Change , 2007, MIS Q..

[16]  K. Burke A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[17]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[18]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Power and Organizational Transformation through Technology: Hybrids of Electronic Government , 2009 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Entanglements in Practice: Performing Anonymity Through Social Media , 2014, MIS Q..

[20]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[21]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Reframing Success and Failure of Information Systems: A Performative Perspective , 2014, MIS Q..

[22]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[23]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Technology and Sociomaterial Performation , 2014, IS&O.

[24]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[25]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[26]  Matthew Jones,et al.  A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care , 2014, MIS Q..

[27]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[28]  Lucas D. Introna Management, information and power: A narrative of the involved manager , 1997 .

[29]  Athina Karatzogianni,et al.  Agency in Posthuman IR: Solving the Problem of Technosocially Mediated Agency , 2017 .

[30]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Some considerations for articles introducing new and/or novel quantitative methods to IS researchers , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[33]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Understanding governance, risk and compliance information systems (GRC IS): The experts view , 2016, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[34]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[35]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[36]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[37]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[40]  Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[42]  Yasmin Merali,et al.  The Broader Context for ICT4D Projects: A Morphogenetic Analysis , 2013, MIS Q..

[43]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[44]  Manuel DeLanda Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason , 2016 .

[45]  R. Paul Review of "The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdoms of systems" by Claudio Ciborra, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002 , 2005 .

[46]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[47]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[48]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[49]  T. Pollock,et al.  A Grammar of Motives. , 1945 .

[50]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[51]  Will Venters,et al.  A Trichordal Temporal Approach to Digital Coordination: The Sociomaterial Mangling of the CERN Grid , 2014, MIS Q..

[52]  Lucas D. Introna Management, Information and Power , 1997 .