Effect of Pavement Roughness on User Costs

After the construction of a pavement system, deterioration occurs because of traffic loading and weathering action and results in the formation of various types of distresses and an increase in pavement roughness. “Roughness” can be defined as irregularities of pavement surface that affect driver safety and increase user costs, including fuel consumption, repair and maintenance, depreciation, and tire costs. In this study, pavement roughness was predicted with the use of the newly released Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for levels of initial roughness condition. Four alternative maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategies were used to estimate the life-cycle cost of pavement over a 35-year analysis period. Various categories of user costs were calculated on the basis of different cost models and from data reported in the literature. From this analysis, pavement roughness was found to affect user costs dramatically. A comparison was made between agency investment and user costs related to pavement roughness. The results of this analysis showed that agency costs were small compared with roughness-related user costs over the life of the pavement (less than 4% of total costs) and that agency investment in increased rehabilitation activities could have a 50-fold return in the form of reduced user costs. A strong case is made for the critical importance of investing in enhanced M&R activities to reduce pavement roughness. This case is strengthened by hypothesized benefits in pavement system sustainability through reduced user fuel costs and reduced tire wear and increased remaining life of pavement.

[1]  Gary Barnes,et al.  Per Mile Costs of Operating Automobiles and Trucks , 2004 .

[2]  Rohan W. Perera,et al.  Ride Quality Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements Subjected to Different Rehabilitation Strategies , 2006 .

[3]  Carlos E. Correa,et al.  LTPP DATA ANALYSIS: EFFECTIVENESS OF MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION OPTIONS , 2002 .

[4]  Harold L. Von Quintus,et al.  Smoothness Models for Hot-Mix Asphalt-Surfaced Pavements: Developed from Long-Term Pavement Performance Program Data , 2001 .

[5]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2007 .

[6]  Edward S. K. Fekpe Effects of Routine Maintenance on Flexible Pavement Condition , 1995 .

[7]  Karim Chatti,et al.  Calibration of HDM-4 Models for Estimating the Effect of Pavement Roughness on Fuel Consumption for U.S. Conditions , 2010 .

[8]  J Walls,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design — Interim Technical Bulletin , 1998 .

[9]  Kathleen T. Hall,et al.  Estimation of Present Serviceability Index from International Roughness Index , 1999 .

[10]  Robert Harrison,et al.  Depreciation and Interest Costs, Some Evidence from Brazil , 1981 .

[11]  X-P Lu Effects of Road Roughness on Vehicular Rolling Resistance , 1985 .

[12]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Measuring road roughness and its effects on user cost and comfort , 1985 .

[13]  T Haugodegard,et al.  NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION: A COMPLETE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN OPERATION , 1994 .

[14]  G. M. Davis The Department of Transportation , 1970 .

[15]  John P. Zaniewski,et al.  VEHICLE OPERATING COSTS, FUEL CONSUMPTION, AND PAVEMENT TYPE AND CONDITION FACTORS , 1982 .