Uncanny,Sexy,and Threatening Robots : The Online Community’s Attitude to and Perceptions of Robots Varying in Humanlikeness and Gender

To get a better understanding of people's natural responses to humanlike robots outside the lab, we analyzed commentary on online videos depicting robots of different humanlikeness and gender. We built on previous work, which compared online video commentary of moderately and highly humanlike robots with respect to valence, uncanny valley, threats, and objectification. Additionally, we took into account the robot's gender, its appearance, its societal impact, the attribution of mental states, and how people attribute human stereotypes to robots. The results are mostly in line with previous work. Overall, the findings indicate that moderately humanlike robot design may be preferable over highly humanlike robot design because it is less associated with negative attitudes and perceptions. Robot designers should therefore be cautious when designing highly humanlike and gendered robots.

[1]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Shruti Sannon,et al.  "Alexa is my new BFF": Social Roles, User Satisfaction, and Personification of the Amazon Echo , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  Development of a psychological scale for general impressions of humanoid , 2013, Adv. Robotics.

[4]  Donald C. Abel.  Consciousness: Introduction , 2014 .

[5]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Development of an Android Robot for Studying Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, IEA/AIE.

[7]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley , 2016, Cognition.

[8]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[9]  Roger Bemelmans,et al.  Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[10]  Eduardo Benítez Sandoval,et al.  The (Ir)relevance of Robot Cuteness: An Exploratory Study of Emotionally Durable Robot Design , 2019, OZCHI.

[11]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Robots And Racism , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Jasmin Bernotat,et al.  The (Fe)male Robot: How Robot Body Shape Impacts First Impressions and Trust Towards Robots , 2019, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[13]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Using Socially Assistive Human–Robot Interaction to Motivate Physical Exercise for Older Adults , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  A review of the applicability of robots in education , 2013 .

[15]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Shaping human-robot interaction: understanding the social aspects of intelligent robotic products , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[16]  C. Breazeal,et al.  SCHMOOZING WITH ROBOTS : EXPLORING THE BOUNDARY OF THE ORIGINAL WIRELESS NETWORK , 1999 .

[17]  Steven J. Stroessner,et al.  The Social Perception of Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots: Effects of Gendered and Machinelike Features , 2018, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[18]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Appearance of a Robot Affects the Impact of its Behaviour on Perceived Trustworthiness and Empathy , 2016, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[19]  Emily J. Ashurst,et al.  Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[21]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[22]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Exploring the role of robots in home organization , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  Martina Mara,et al.  Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  How people perceive different robot types: A direct comparison of an android, humanoid, and non-biomimetic robot , 2016, 2016 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST).

[25]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Humanoid Robots for a Science Museum , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[26]  Jahna Otterbacher,et al.  S/he's too Warm/Agentic! The Influence of Gender on Uncanny Reactions to Robots , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[27]  A. Billard,et al.  Chapter 18 Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota , a Humanoid Robotic Doll , 1995 .

[28]  Christian A. Gonzalez,et al.  Seeing Minds in Others – Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences? , 2016, PloS one.

[29]  Angela Tinwell,et al.  Perception of psychopathy and the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  M. Laeeq Khan.  Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[32]  Michael Schmitz,et al.  Concepts for life-like interactive objects , 2010, TEI.

[33]  Patrícia Arriaga,et al.  Humanization of robots: Is it really such a good idea? , 2019, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[34]  Jean-Christophe Giger,et al.  Predicting intention to work with social robots at anticipation stage: Assessing the role of behavioral desire and anticipated emotions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[36]  Gabriele Trovato,et al.  Mind attribution to Androids: A comparative study with Italian and Japanese adolescents , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[37]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[38]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[39]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Culturally Variable Preferences for Robot Design and Use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[40]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Virginia Contreras,et al.  The public's perception of humanlike robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[42]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Conversational Gaze Aversion for Humanlike Robots , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[43]  Peter Robinson,et al.  How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[44]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  Congruency Matters - How Ambiguous Gender Cues Increase a Robot's Uncanniness , 2016, ICSR.