Development of a multi‐criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM)

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to develop a multi‐criteria hierarchical maintenance performance measurement framework, which is balanced, holistic and integrated to various levels of the organization.Design/methodology/approach – Consolidation of published research and current practices are combined to study, identify and develop this proposed framework.Findings – A framework for maintenance performance measurement is proposed for developing and implementing a relevant, timely, reliable, cost and time‐effective and user‐friendly system for stakeholders at various levels. The indicators at the subsystem/component level, plant level and corporate level are linked with the MPIs for the organizational objectives and strategy.Practical implications – Management of maintenance performance is critical for long term economic viability of business and industry. Development of an integrated, balanced and holistic MPM system needs to consider various issues to measure the contribution of maintenance towards ...

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[2]  Harlow B. Cohen.  The performance paradox , 1998 .

[3]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[4]  Albert H. C. Tsang.  Strategic dimensions of maintenance management , 2002 .

[5]  A. Neely.  The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? , 1999 .

[6]  S. Wongrassamee,et al.  Performance measurement tools: the Balanced Scorecard and the EFQM Excellence Model , 2003 .

[7]  Umit S. Bititci,et al.  Dynamics of performance measurement systems , 2000, APMS.

[8]  Andrew K. S. Jardine,et al.  Measuring maintenance performance: a holistic approach , 1999 .

[9]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Dynamics of performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[10]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  A literature review of manufacturing performance measures and measurement in an organizational context: a framework and direction for future research , 2004 .

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[12]  Andrej Atrens,et al.  Strategic maintenance management , 2002 .

[13]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing performance measures: a structured approach , 1997 .

[14]  Salih O. Duffuaa,et al.  Performance measures for academic departments , 2003 .

[15]  James S. Noble,et al.  The changing basis of performance measurement , 1996 .

[16]  J. Campbell.  UPTIME: Strategies for Excellence in Maintenance Management , 1995 .

[17]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[18]  Zahir Irani,et al.  A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems , 2001 .

[19]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges , 2006 .

[20]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[21]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Managing our way to economic decline , 2007 .

[22]  Pradip Kumar Ray,et al.  Productivity measurement through multi-criteria decision making , 1990 .

[23]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[24]  D. S. Sink,et al.  Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future , 1989 .

[25]  Albert H. C. Tsang,et al.  A strategic approach to managing maintenance performance , 1998 .

[26]  Philip M. Marcus,et al.  The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business , 1979 .

[27]  R. Johnston,et al.  Performance Measurement in Service Businesses , 1992 .

[28]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Measurement of business excellence , 1998 .

[29]  Derek Steeple,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDITING AND ENHANCING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[30]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition , 1990 .

[31]  Alain Abran,et al.  A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards , 2003 .

[32]  J. Sharp,et al.  Tqm In Maintenance To Improve Manufacturing Performance , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[33]  S.D.P. Flapper,et al.  Towards consistent performance management systems , 1996 .

[34]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Measuring Your Way to Profit , 1994 .

[35]  A. Neely,et al.  Measuring performance in a changing business environment , 2003 .

[36]  Jens Ove Riis,et al.  A situational maintenance model , 1997 .

[37]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  An application of a multi‐criteria approach to assessing the performance of Portugal's economic sectors , 2005 .

[38]  M. Cross.  RAISING THE VALUE OF MAINTENANCE IN THE CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[39]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[40]  R. Eccles.  The performance measurement manifesto. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[41]  Jayantha P. Liyanage,et al.  Management of assets, resources and maintenance by using a balanced scorecard based performance framework , 2002 .

[42]  Hans Ahlmann,et al.  From traditional practice to the new understanding: the significance of the Life Cycle Profit concept in the management of industrial enterprises , 2002 .

[43]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness , 1997 .