Do covered nude photographs in the internet induce sexual cognition - A study of event-related potential

Abstract A number indecent photos depicting models whose genital areas have been censored or covered have been widely disseminated on the Internet and proved to be extremely popular. The question is whether these “incomplete nudes” on the Internet can induce sexual cognition. To answer this question, this study presented 25 male college students with 4 types of images. Results found that pictures of females induced larger positive potential (P2) amplitudes and shorter latencies than did pictures of males, and that pictures of nude females induced larger negative potential (N2) amplitudes than did pictures of nude males. Moreover, pictures of covered or nude females evoked larger P300 waves than did pictures of fully-dressed or underwear-wearing females. Pictures of nude models also evoked larger PSW than did other types of pictures. These results suggested that P2 and N2 reflect early gender processing and early sexual cognition, respectively, while P300 reflect inferential sexual cognition which meant that covered models were indeed perceived as nude models. This study revealed that censored (covered) sexual information disseminated through the Internet could still evoke inferential sexual cognition.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[2]  Yue-jia Luo,et al.  The time course of implicit processing of erotic pictures: An event-related potential study , 2011, Brain Research.

[3]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  Bayesian contour extrapolation: Geometric determinants of good continuation , 2007, Vision Research.

[4]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  Precision and consistency of contour interpolation , 2008, Vision Research.

[5]  B. Tjan,et al.  Better discrimination for illusory than for occluded perceptual completions. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  T. Gruber,et al.  Event-related frontal alpha asymmetries: electrophysiological correlates of approach motivation , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Stimulus novelty and emotion perception: the near absence of habituation in the visual cortex , 2006, Neuroreport.

[10]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Distinguishing specific sexual and general emotional effects in fMRI—Subcortical and cortical arousal during erotic picture viewing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Kim Wallen,et al.  Sex Differences in Response to Visual Sexual Stimuli: A Review , 2008, Archives of sexual behavior.

[13]  F. Smulders,et al.  The effect of visual sexual content on the event-related potential , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Philip J Kellman,et al.  Surface integration influences depth discrimination , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  Gregory D. Webster,et al.  The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  F. Martin,et al.  Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  Why Do We Need What We Need? A Terror Management Perspective on the Roots of Human Social Motivation , 1997 .

[18]  Sean D. Kristjansson,et al.  Rapid discrimination of visual scene content in the human brain , 2006, Brain Research.

[19]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[20]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Jonathan E. Butner,et al.  Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. , 2003, Psychological review.

[22]  R. Stark,et al.  Gender commonalities and differences in the neural processing of visual sexual stimuli. , 2013, The journal of sexual medicine.

[23]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. , 1995 .

[24]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and the motivational brain , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[25]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[27]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.