A Comparative Study on Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance Using a Hybrid Online Setting
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. McIntosh,et al. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect , 2022, Laterality.
[2] Gaspare Galati,et al. A Systematic Review on the Interaction between Emotion and Pseudoneglect , 2021, Symmetry.
[3] M. Papadatou-Pastou,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults , 2021, Neuropsychology Review.
[4] Izak Duenyas,et al. Running online experiments using web-conferencing software , 2020, Journal of the Economic Science Association.
[5] Z. Woodhead,et al. Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study , 2020, Laterality.
[6] Oliver J Gray,et al. Information content best characterises the hemispheric selectivity of the inferior parietal lobe: a meta-analysis , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[7] Z. Woodhead,et al. The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis , 2020, PeerJ.
[8] Gudela Grote,et al. Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World , 2020 .
[9] Justin M. Ales,et al. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent , 2020, Neuropsychologia.
[10] L. Elias,et al. The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review , 2018, Neuropsychology Review.
[11] Natasha Z. Kirkham,et al. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.
[12] F. Kingdom,et al. Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[13] S Enge,et al. Comparability, stability, and reliability of internet-based mental chronometry in domestic and laboratory settings , 2018, Behavior research methods.
[14] Gregor Thut,et al. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study , 2017, NeuroImage.
[15] L. Zago,et al. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers , 2017, Neuropsychologia.
[16] S. Sala,et al. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length , 2016, Brain and Cognition.
[17] G. Thut,et al. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect , 2015, PloS one.
[18] C. Kim,et al. Feasibility of a Semi-computerized Line Bisection Test for Unilateral Visual Neglect Assessment , 2015, Applied Clinical Informatics.
[19] Gregor Thut,et al. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length☆ , 2014, NeuroImage.
[20] G. Thut,et al. Spatial attention: Differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes , 2013, Neuropsychologia.
[21] Rolf Verleger,et al. Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[22] P. Peigneux,et al. Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging , 2013, Cortex.
[23] John V. McDonnell,et al. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research , 2013, PloS one.
[24] Nicolaas Prins,et al. The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. , 2012, Journal of vision.
[25] David G. Rand,et al. Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.
[26] R. Verleger,et al. Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. , 2011, Psychophysiology.
[27] K. Goedert,et al. Spatial Bias and Right Hemisphere Function: Sex-Specific Changes with Aging , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[28] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[29] M. Catani,et al. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[30] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.
[31] T. Kuhlen,et al. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space , 2010, Brain and Cognition.
[32] Yiqing Liang,et al. A Learning Model for the Automated Assessment of Hand-Drawn Images for Visuo-Spatial Neglect Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.
[33] Piotr Jaskowski,et al. On Why Left Events are the Right Ones: Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Left-hemifield Advantage in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] R. Knight,et al. Brain Activity During Landmark and Line Bisection Tasks , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[35] Frédéric Dandurand,et al. Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[36] Edgar Erdfelder,et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[37] M. Perenin,et al. A common basis for visual and tactile exploration deficits in spatial neglect? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[38] M. Corballis,et al. Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[39] M. Harvey. Perceptual and Premotor Neglect: Is there an Ideal Task to Categorise Patients? , 2004, Cortex.
[40] S. Gosling,et al. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.
[41] Iain D. Gilchrist,et al. Categorisation of ‘perceptual’ and ‘premotor’ neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy? , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[42] O. Güntürkün,et al. Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[43] M. McCourt. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[44] M. S. Fowler,et al. Evidence from a line bisection task for visuospatial neglect in Left Hemiparkinson's disease , 2001, Vision Research.
[45] M. McCourt,et al. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[46] M. Harvey,et al. Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[47] Mark E. McCourt,et al. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[48] Edoardo Bisiach,et al. Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.
[49] J. Mattingley,et al. Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect? , 1994, Neuropsychologia.
[50] A. Milner,et al. Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.
[51] A. Milner,et al. To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.
[52] Klaus Willmes,et al. Is there a generalized right hemisphere dominance for mediating cerebral activation? Evidence from a choice reaction experiment with lateralized simple warning stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.
[53] John C. Marshall,et al. When Right Goes Left: An Investigation of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1989, Cortex.
[54] Gail Kuslansky,et al. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection , 1987, Neuropsychologia.
[55] K. Heilman,et al. Material-specific hemispheric activation , 1980, Neuropsychologia.
[56] K. Heilman,et al. Right hemisphere dominance for attention , 1980, Neurology.
[57] K. Heilman,et al. Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation , 1979, Neuropsychologia.
[58] J. Bradshaw,et al. Hemispheric Differences in Processing Visual Patterns , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.