A Comparative Study on Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance Using a Hybrid Online Setting

Bisection tasks are commonly used to assess biases and asymmetries in visuospatial attention in both patients and neurologically intact individuals. In these tasks, participants are usually asked to identify the midpoint and manually bisect a horizontal line. Typically, healthy individuals tend to show an attention processing advantage for the left visual field, known as “pseudoneglect.” Here, performance at two computerized versions of the task was compared to assess pseudoneglect in neurologically intact individuals. Specifically, we used a hybrid online setting in which subjects (n = 35) performed the online tasks under the video guidance of the experimenter. We measured attentional biases in the line bisection and landmark tasks. We found pseudoneglect in both tasks, although the bias was larger in the line bisection task. Overall, these findings show that hybrid online tasks may provide a valid setting to assess attentional biases and suggest their feasibility in the clinical setting.

[1]  R. McIntosh,et al.  On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect , 2022, Laterality.

[2]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  A Systematic Review on the Interaction between Emotion and Pseudoneglect , 2021, Symmetry.

[3]  M. Papadatou-Pastou,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults , 2021, Neuropsychology Review.

[4]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Running online experiments using web-conferencing software , 2020, Journal of the Economic Science Association.

[5]  Z. Woodhead,et al.  Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study , 2020, Laterality.

[6]  Oliver J Gray,et al.  Information content best characterises the hemispheric selectivity of the inferior parietal lobe: a meta-analysis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Z. Woodhead,et al.  The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis , 2020, PeerJ.

[8]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World , 2020 .

[9]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  L. Elias,et al.  The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review , 2018, Neuropsychology Review.

[11]  Natasha Z. Kirkham,et al.  Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[12]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[13]  S Enge,et al.  Comparability, stability, and reliability of internet-based mental chronometry in domestic and laboratory settings , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[14]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study , 2017, NeuroImage.

[15]  L. Zago,et al.  Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  S. Sala,et al.  Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  G. Thut,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  C. Kim,et al.  Feasibility of a Semi-computerized Line Bisection Test for Unilateral Visual Neglect Assessment , 2015, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[19]  Gregor Thut,et al.  On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length☆ , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  G. Thut,et al.  Spatial attention: Differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[22]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging , 2013, Cortex.

[23]  John V. McDonnell,et al.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Nicolaas Prins,et al.  The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[25]  David G. Rand,et al.  Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  R. Verleger,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[27]  K. Goedert,et al.  Spatial Bias and Right Hemisphere Function: Sex-Specific Changes with Aging , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[31]  T. Kuhlen,et al.  Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  Yiqing Liang,et al.  A Learning Model for the Automated Assessment of Hand-Drawn Images for Visuo-Spatial Neglect Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[33]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  On Why Left Events are the Right Ones: Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Left-hemifield Advantage in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Knight,et al.  Brain Activity During Landmark and Line Bisection Tasks , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Frédéric Dandurand,et al.  Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[37]  M. Perenin,et al.  A common basis for visual and tactile exploration deficits in spatial neglect? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  M. Corballis,et al.  Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  M. Harvey Perceptual and Premotor Neglect: Is there an Ideal Task to Categorise Patients? , 2004, Cortex.

[40]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[41]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Categorisation of ‘perceptual’ and ‘premotor’ neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy? , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. McCourt Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. S. Fowler,et al.  Evidence from a line bisection task for visuospatial neglect in Left Hemiparkinson's disease , 2001, Vision Research.

[45]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  M. Harvey,et al.  Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect? , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  A. Milner,et al.  To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Is there a generalized right hemisphere dominance for mediating cerebral activation? Evidence from a choice reaction experiment with lateralized simple warning stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When Right Goes Left: An Investigation of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1989, Cortex.

[54]  Gail Kuslansky,et al.  Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  K. Heilman,et al.  Material-specific hemispheric activation , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance for attention , 1980, Neurology.

[57]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Processing Visual Patterns , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.