A study of technical signs in science: implications for lexical database development.

Both classroom instruction and lexical database development stand to benefit from applied research on sign language, which takes into consideration American Sign Language rules, pedagogical issues, and teacher characteristics. In this study of technical science signs, teachers' experience with signing and, especially, knowledge of content, were found to be essential for the identification of signs appropriate for instruction. The results of this study also indicate a need for a systematic approach to examine both sign selection and its impact on learning by deaf students. Recommendations are made for the development of lexical databases and areas of research for optimizing the use of sign language in instruction.

[1]  R. Battison,et al.  A project for standardization and development of technical signs. , 1977, American annals of the deaf.

[2]  F. Caccamise,et al.  Signs and Manual Communication Systems: Selection, Standardization, and Development , 1997, American annals of the deaf.

[3]  J. D. Bonvillian,et al.  Effects of Signability and Imagery on Word Recall of Deaf and Hearing Students , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  S. Shroyer,et al.  Signs Across America: A Look at Regional Differences in American Sign Language , 1984 .

[5]  H. Klions,et al.  Deaf versus hearing subjects' recall of words on a distraction task as a function of the signability of the words. , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  H. Lang,et al.  Characteristics of Effective Teachers: A Descriptive Study of the Perceptions of Faculty and Deaf College Students , 2012 .

[7]  J. D. Bonvillian,et al.  Learning & Recall of Word-Sign Pairs: The Impact of Sign Etymology , 2013 .

[8]  H. G. Lang,et al.  Critical Teaching Incidents: Recollections of Deaf College Students , 1994, American annals of the deaf.

[9]  Elaine Costello.  Random House Webster's American Sign Language Dictionary , 1997 .

[10]  Punyashloke Mishra.  The Role of Abstraction in Scientific Illustration: Implications for Pedagogy , 1999 .

[11]  W. Stokoe,et al.  A treatise on signed and spoken language in early 19th century deaf education in america. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[12]  Robert Bayley,et al.  Lexical Variation in African American and White Signing , 2001 .

[13]  Marc Marschark,et al.  Educating Deaf Students: From Research to Practice , 2001, DECP Debate.

[14]  Thomas Hanke,et al.  GlossLexer: A multimedia lexical database for sign language dictionary compilation , 2002 .

[15]  David Brien,et al.  Section III: Developing linguistic specifications for a sign language database: The development of Signbase , 2002 .

[16]  H. G. Lang.  Higher education for deaf students: research priorities in the new millennium. , 2002, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[17]  Robert Bayley,et al.  What's Your Sign for Pizza?: An Introduction to Variation in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[18]  Harry G. Lang,et al.  Web-based science instruction for deaf students: What research says to the teacher , 2003 .

[19]  Claudia M. Pagliaro,et al.  Factors predicting recall of mathematics terms by deaf students: implications for teaching. , 2007, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[20]  Thomas Hopkins,et al.  What is American Sign Language , 2009 .