Mathematical approaches to modeling development and reprogramming

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are created by the reprogramming of somatic cells via overexpression of certain transcription factors, such as the originally described Yamanaka factors: Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM). Here we discuss recent advancements in iPSC reprogramming and introduce mathematical approaches to help map the landscape between cell states during reprogramming. Our modelization indicates that OSKM expression diminishes and/or changes potential barriers between cell states and that epigenetic remodeling facilitate these transitions. From a practical perspective, the modeling approaches outlined here allow us to predict the time necessary to create a given number of iPSC colonies or the number of reprogrammed cells generated in a given time. Additional investigations will help to further refine modeling strategies, rendering them applicable toward the study of the development and stability of cancer cells or even other reprogramming processes such as lineage conversion. Ultimately, a quantitative understanding of cell state transitions might facilitate the establishment of regenerative medicine strategies and enhance the translation of reprogramming technologies into the clinic.

[1]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[2]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[3]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[4]  A. Consiglio,et al.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells , 2008, Science.

[6]  J. Utikal,et al.  Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells , 2009, Nature.

[7]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Alessandra Giorgetti,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood using OCT4 and SOX2. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[10]  B. Berne,et al.  First passage time distribution in stochastic processes with moving and static absorbing boundaries with application to biological rupture experiments. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Erkang Wang,et al.  Potential and flux landscapes quantify the stability and robustness of budding yeast cell cycle network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. Wrana,et al.  Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[14]  Helen M. Blau,et al.  Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation , 2010, Nature.

[15]  Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte,et al.  A High Proliferation Rate Is Required for Cell Reprogramming and Maintenance of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Identity , 2011, Current Biology.

[16]  Yong Jin Choi,et al.  miR-34 miRNAs provide a barrier for somatic cell reprogramming , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct Lineage Conversions: Unnatural but useful? , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Jane E. Visvader,et al.  Cells of origin in cancer , 2011, Nature.

[20]  S. Lipton,et al.  Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Mudit Gupta,et al.  Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[22]  Emily Bernstein,et al.  Stem cells and reprogramming: breaking the epigenetic barrier? , 2011, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[23]  Dong Ryul Lee,et al.  Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  J. Carroll,et al.  Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. , 2011, Genes & development.

[25]  Guy S. Salvesen,et al.  SnapShot: Caspases , 2011, Cell.

[26]  J. C. Belmonte,et al.  Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation and reprogramming: three routes to regeneration , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  Gang Wang,et al.  Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[28]  Anatol C. Kreitzer,et al.  Direct reprogramming of mouse and human fibroblasts into multipotent neural stem cells with a single factor. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[29]  Greg Donahue,et al.  Facilitators and Impediments of the Pluripotency Reprogramming Factors' Initial Engagement with the Genome , 2012, Cell.

[30]  C. Furusawa,et al.  A Dynamical-Systems View of Stem Cell Biology , 2012, Science.

[31]  Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al.  Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2012, Cell reports.

[32]  I. Sancho-Martinez,et al.  Lineage conversion methodologies meet the reprogramming toolbox , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  J. Visvader,et al.  Cancer stem cells: current status and evolving complexities. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[34]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts into stably expandable neural stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[35]  J. Wrana,et al.  A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[36]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells , 2012, Cell.

[37]  J. Hubbard,et al.  Predicting rates of cell state change caused by stochastic fluctuations using a data-driven landscape model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.

[40]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  I. Sancho-Martinez,et al.  Reprogramming of human fibroblasts to pluripotency with lineage specifiers. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[42]  Jan Paul Medema,et al.  Cancer stem cells: The challenges ahead , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  Oliver Brüstle,et al.  Leveling Waddington: the emergence of direct programming and the loss of cell fate hierarchies , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  K. Zaret,et al.  Understanding impediments to cellular conversion to pluripotency by assessing the earliest events in ectopic transcription factor binding to the genome , 2013, Cell cycle.

[45]  Zohar Mukamel,et al.  Deterministic direct reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency , 2013, Nature.

[46]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Epigenetic regulation in pluripotent stem cells: a key to breaking the epigenetic barrier , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Ben D. MacArthur,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Pluripotency , 2013, Cell.

[48]  J. Shu,et al.  Induction of Pluripotency in Mouse Somatic Cells with Lineage Specifiers , 2013, Cell.

[49]  Y. Geng,et al.  Reprogramming somatic cells to pluripotency: A fresh look at Yamanaka’s model , 2013, Cell cycle.

[50]  P. Cahan,et al.  Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Jieying Zhu,et al.  H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[52]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic variations in iPSCs: potential causes and implications for application. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[53]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying Cell Fate Decisions for Differentiation and Reprogramming of a Human Stem Cell Network: Landscape and Biological Paths , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  F. Gage,et al.  Conversion of human fibroblasts into angioblast-like multipotent progenitor cells , 2012, Nature Methods.

[55]  J. Medema,et al.  Cancer stem cell dynamics in tumor progression and metastasis: is the microenvironment to blame? , 2013, Cancer letters.