A Longitudinal Study Exploring Motivation Factors in Cornerstone and Capstone Design Courses

Design courses are an integral component of undergraduate engineering education. Design is recognized as one of the primary responsibilities of an engineer in industry. New designs are responsible for stimulating sales and company growth. This paper presents the findings of a four year longitudinal study on the impact of motivation factors on course performance of mechanical engineering students in design courses. The first design course, cornerstone design, takes place during the first semester of freshman year. The second course, capstone design, takes place during the student’s final year of undergraduate study. An adapted version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) is used to measure five motivation factors: cognitive value, selfregulation, test/presentation anxiety, intrinsic value, and self-efficacy. Motivation is measured against the final grade in the course. The major contribution of this paper is the ability to examine the impact of motivation on grades in design courses. The motivation and performance is also measured with regard to student gender, residency (domestic or international), family income, and highest degree attained by parents to determine if a correlation is realized. Additionally, the study focuses on a single cohort of 32 students. This affords the ability for the examination of the differences in motivation between the students’ freshman and senior year to determine if this can be correlated to student gender, residency (domestic or international), family income, and degree attained by parents. The results of the study indicate that the student’s freshman cornerstone design grades are impacted by their freshman anxiety levels with significance, which was further exacerbated by the student’s residency. On the other hand, the senior capstone design grades were impacted by their intrinsic motivation. The change in their grade between their freshman and senior year was correlated to their freshman year anxiety and their residency, though the students exhibited similar levels of anxiety during their senior year.

[1]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[2]  D. Rundus,et al.  The capstone senior design course: an initiative in partnering with industry , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[3]  A. Yeung,et al.  Primary and secondary students motivation in learning English: Grade and gender differences , 2011 .

[4]  Justine B. Allen,et al.  Contemporary measures of approach and avoidance goal orientations: similarities and differences. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  E. W. Banios.  Teaching engineering practices , 1991, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order.

[6]  D. McInerney,et al.  Multidimensional and Hierarchical Assessment of School Motivation: Cross‐cultural validation , 2006 .

[7]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Integrated product and process design: a capstone course in mechanical and manufacturing engineering , 1991, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order.

[8]  Mary J. Fischer,et al.  Why they leave: the impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors , 2012, Social Psychology of Education.

[9]  G. W. Hitt,et al.  Engineering design education: Towards design thinking , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).

[10]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Shraddha Sangelkar,et al.  Improving Senior Capstone Design Student Performance Through Integration of Presentation Intervention Plan , 2015 .

[12]  Beshoy Morkos,et al.  Correlating Student Motivation to Course Performance in Capstone Design , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas J. Joyce,et al.  ‘Part of the Community?’ First Year International Students and Their Engineering Teams , 2014 .

[14]  J. E. Salt,et al.  An electrical engineering design course sequence using a top-down design methodology , 1994 .

[15]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. , 1999 .

[16]  Cassie M. Lynch,et al.  Delayed College Entry and the Socioeconomic Gap: Examining the Roles of Student Plans, Family Income, Parental Education, and Parental Occupation , 2012 .

[17]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[18]  Yonggao Yang,et al.  Connecting Incoming Freshmen with Engineering through Hands-On Projects , 2011 .

[19]  F. Prins,et al.  Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. , 2000 .

[20]  Nathan Hotaling,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course , 2012 .

[21]  M. Levis-Fitzgerald,et al.  Increasing Persistence in Undergraduate Science Majors: A Model for Institutional Support of Underrepresented Students , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[22]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[23]  LeAnne Coder,et al.  Why are there so few women in information technology? Assessing the role of personality in career choices ☆ , 2008 .

[24]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[25]  John Tucker.  Tinto's Model and Successful College Transitions , 1999 .

[26]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Designettes: An Approach to Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Education , 2016 .

[27]  Louise R. Alexitch,et al.  Social Skills Difficulty: Model of Culture Shock for International Graduate Students , 2004 .

[28]  L. Ho,et al.  The Effects of Schooling on Gender Differences , 2002 .

[29]  A. Elliot.  A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct. , 2005 .

[30]  Wilbert J. McKeachie.  Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. A Review of the Research Literature (1986) and November 1987 Supplement. , 1987 .

[31]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[32]  Chun Liang Zhang,et al.  Engineering Education and Management , 2012 .

[33]  John B. Cullen,et al.  Dropout in Higher Education: A Review and Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. , 1973 .

[34]  Vincent Tinto.  Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research , 1975 .

[35]  N. Ramachandran.  Enhancing international students’ experiences: An imperative agenda for universities in the UK , 2011 .

[36]  Sherry Marx,et al.  Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering , 2014 .

[37]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses , 1997 .

[38]  Sigmund Tobias,et al.  Test Anxiety: Interference, Defective Skills, and Cognitive Capacity , 1985 .

[39]  Caroline H. Vickers.  Second Language Socialization Through Team Interaction Among Electrical and Computer Engineering Students , 2007 .

[40]  Nicholas S. Baker.  Multifaceted Learning Objective Assessment in a Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Course , 2016 .

[41]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[42]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[43]  Christine Eckert,et al.  Gender differences in school success: what are the roles of students’ intelligence, personality and motivation? , 2014 .

[44]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[45]  Ronnel B. King.  Gender differences in motivation, engagement and achievement are related to students' perceptions of peer—but not of parent or teacher—attitudes toward school , 2016 .

[46]  Sandra Courter,et al.  From the Students' Point of View: Experiences in a Freshman Engineering Design Course , 1998 .

[47]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[48]  Nina L. Colwill,et al.  The psychology of sex differences , 1978 .