A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry.

PURPOSE This 3rd of 4 articles on a study of the efficacy of the 2-stage otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response (OAE/A-ABR) newborn hearing screening protocol describes (a) the behavioral audiometric protocol used to validate hearing status at 8-12 months of age, (b) the hearing status of the sample, and (c) the success of the visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) protocol across 7 sites. METHOD A total of 973 infants who failed OAE but passed A-ABR, in one or both ears, during newborn screening were tested with a VRA protocol, supplemented by tympanometry and OAE screening at age 8-12 months. RESULTS VRA audiograms (1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz) were obtained for 1,184 (82.7%) of the 1,432 study ears. Hearing loss was ruled out in another 100 ears by VRA in combination with OAE, for a total of 88.7% of the study sample. Permanent hearing loss was identified in 30 ears of 21 infants. Sites differed in their success with the VRA protocol. CONCLUSIONS Continued monitoring of hearing beyond the newborn period is an important component of early detection of hearing loss. Using a structured protocol, VRA is an appropriate test method for most, but not all, infants. A battery of test procedures is often needed to adequately delineate hearing loss in infants. Examiner experience appears to be a factor in successful VRA.

[1]  B. Vohr,et al.  A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study. , 2005, American journal of audiology.

[2]  B. Vohr,et al.  A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: introduction and overview of the study. , 2005, American journal of audiology.

[3]  B. Vohr,et al.  A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: recommendations for policy, practice, and research. , 2005, American journal of audiology.

[4]  B. Vohr,et al.  A Multicenter Evaluation of How Many Infants With Permanent Hearing Loss Pass a Two-Stage Otoacoustic Emissions/Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Newborn Hearing Screening Protocol , 2005, Pediatrics.

[5]  M. Kurs-Lasky,et al.  Hearing Levels in Infants and Young Children in Relation to Testing Technique, Age Group, and the Presence or Absence of Middle-Ear Effusion , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[6]  B. Vohr,et al.  Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. , 2001, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  J. Bamford,et al.  Evidence on the Efficacy of Insert Earphone and Sound Field VRA with Young Infants , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[8]  Michael P. Gorga,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Hearing Status at 8 to 12 Months Corrected Age Using a Visual Reinforcement Audiometry Protocol , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Yvonne Sininger,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission, and Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[10]  I. Wallace,et al.  Effects of otitis media with effusion on hearing in the first 3 years of life. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  A. Cacace,et al.  New York State Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Demonstration Project: Effects of Screening Protocol on Inpatient Outcome Measures , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[12]  A. Davis,et al.  Field Sensitivity of Targeted Neonatal Hearing Screening using the Nottingham ABR Screener , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Mark E. Lutman,et al.  Field Sensitivity of Targeted Neonatal Hearing Screening by Transient‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[14]  A. Oudesluys-Murphy,et al.  Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response infant hearing screening method in at risk neonates , 1996, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[15]  D. Watson,et al.  Auditory brainstem response screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates. , 1996, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[16]  J. Roush,et al.  Developmental changes in static admittance and tympanometric width in infants and toddlers. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  C. Bluestone,et al.  Identification of Middle Ear Effusion by Aural Acoustic Admittance and Otoscopy , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[18]  C. Talbott A longitudinal study comparing responses of hearing-impaired infants to pure tones using visual reinforcement and play audiometry. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[19]  J. Lemons,et al.  Hearing Screening of High Risk Newborns , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[20]  A. Krumholz,et al.  Hearing screening of high-risk newborns with brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a follow-up study. , 1984, Pediatrics.

[21]  Albert,et al.  THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA , 1955 .

[22]  A. Diefendorf,et al.  Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. , 1995, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[23]  W. R. Wilson,et al.  Behavioral audiometry. , 1991, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.