Development and Use of Machine-Learnt Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Enhanced Prediction of Wake Mixing in Low-Pressure Turbines

Nonlinear turbulence closures were developed that improve the prediction accuracy of wake mixing in low-pressure turbine (LPT) flows. First, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) calculations using five linear turbulence closures were performed for the T106A LPT profile at isentropic exit Reynolds numbers 60,000 and 100,000. None of these RANS models were able to accurately reproduce wake loss profiles, a crucial parameter in LPT design, from direct numerical simulation (DNS) reference data. However, the recently proposed kv2¯ω transition model was found to produce the best agreement with DNS data in terms of blade loading and boundary layer behavior and thus was selected as baseline model for turbulence closure development. Analysis of the DNS data revealed that the linear stress–strain coupling constitutes one of the main model form errors. Hence, a gene-expression programming (GEP) based machine-learning technique was applied to the high-fidelity DNS data to train nonlinear explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models (EARSM), using different training regions. The trained models were first assessed in an a priori sense (without running any RANS calculations) and showed much improved alignment of the trained models in the region of training. Additional RANS calculations were then performed using the trained models. Importantly, to assess their robustness, the trained models were tested both on the cases they were trained for and on testing, i.e., previously not seen, cases with different flow features. The developed models improved prediction of the Reynolds stress, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) production, wake-loss profiles, and wake maturity, across all cases.

[1]  R. Mayle,et al.  The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition , 1996 .

[2]  E. Dick,et al.  Transition Models for Turbomachinery Boundary Layer Flows: A Review , 2017 .

[3]  W. Rodi A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses , 1976 .

[4]  R. Mayle,et al.  Heat Transfer Committee and Turbomachinery Committee Best Paper of 1996 Award: The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition , 1997 .

[5]  H. Hodson,et al.  BLADEROW INTERACTIONS, TRANSITION, AND HIGH-LIFT AEROFOILS IN LOW-PRESSURE TURBINES , 2005 .

[6]  Paul A. Durbin,et al.  A Procedure for Using DNS Databases , 1998 .

[7]  Arne V. Johansson,et al.  An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  F. Bertini,et al.  Predicting High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades Flow Using Transition-Sensitive Turbulence Closures , 2014 .

[9]  Liwei Chen,et al.  Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part II: Effect of Inflow Disturbances , 2015 .

[10]  G. Laskowski,et al.  Machine Learning for Turbulence Model Development Using a High-Fidelity HPT Cascade Simulation , 2017 .

[11]  John P. Clark,et al.  Performance Impacts Due to Wake Mixing in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery , 2006 .

[12]  D. K. Walters,et al.  Prediction of transitional and fully turbulent flow using an alternative to the laminar kinetic energy approach , 2016 .

[13]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Improved Turbulence and Transition Prediction for Turbomachinery Flows , 2014 .

[14]  D. K. Walters,et al.  A Recommended Correction to the kT−kL−ω Transition-Sensitive Eddy-Viscosity Model , 2017 .

[15]  Richard Sandberg,et al.  A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Cândida Ferreira,et al.  Gene Expression Programming: A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems , 2001, Complex Syst..

[17]  S. Pope A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[19]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes , 2009 .

[20]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part I: Methodology , 2015 .

[21]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  The development of algebraic stress models using a novel evolutionary algorithm , 2017 .

[22]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data , 2016, 1606.07987.

[23]  Anand Pratap Singh,et al.  New Approaches in Turbulence and Transition Modeling Using Data-driven Techniques , 2015 .

[24]  Mark McQuilling,et al.  Evaluation of RANS Transition Modeling for High Lift LPT Flows at Low Reynolds Number , 2013 .

[25]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Statistical Turbulence Modelling For Fluid Dynamics - Demystified: An Introductory Text For Graduate Engineering Students , 2015 .

[27]  D. K. Walters,et al.  A Three-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Transitional Flow , 2008 .

[28]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The 1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[29]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  The Transition Mechanism of Highly-Loaded LP Turbine Blades , 2003 .

[30]  Leonhard Fottner,et al.  A Test Case for the Numerical Investigation of Wake Passing Effects on a Highly Loaded LP Turbine Cascade Blade , 2001 .

[31]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[32]  F. Schmitt About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity , 2007 .

[33]  Brendan D. Tracey,et al.  A Machine Learning Strategy to Assist Turbulence Model Development , 2015 .