Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves

Research article abstracts have become an important genre in all knowledge fields, playing a crucial role in persuading readers, and reviewers, to take the time to go further into the paper itself. This promotional aspect of abstracts is well known, but less discussed is the ways writers are able to skilfully foreground their claim, package the information in a cohesive and coherent manner, and craft a disciplinary stance. One such rhetorical strategy is what we are calling metadiscursive nouns. Nouns such as fact, analysis, and belief are common in abstracts and do a great deal of rhetorical work for writers. In this paper we explore the interactive and interactional functions they perform in the rhetorical moves of 240 research abstracts from six disciplines. The results show how these nouns are frequently used to frame and coherently manage arguments while, at the same time, helping writers to claim disciplinary legitimacy and promote the value and relevance of their research to their discipline.

[1]  Douglas Biber,et al.  University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers , 2006 .

[2]  Richard W. Forest,et al.  Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach , 2017 .

[3]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[4]  Paul Gillaerts.  Move analysis of abstracts from a diachronic perspective , 2011 .

[5]  Yan Cao,et al.  A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers , 2013 .

[6]  F. Salager-Meyer.  A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts , 1992 .

[7]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines SECOND EDITION , 2001 .

[8]  K. Hyland,et al.  Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse , 2016 .

[9]  Mauro Bittencourt Dos Santos,et al.  The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics , 1996 .

[10]  John M. Swales,et al.  Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts , 2009 .

[11]  Maggie Charles,et al.  Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction , 2007 .

[12]  D. Biber,et al.  Book Review: Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton , 2007, CL.

[13]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge , 2015 .

[14]  G. Thompson.  Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning To Argue with the Reader. , 2001 .

[15]  M. Charles.  ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines , 2003 .

[16]  B. Samraj,et al.  An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines , 2005 .

[17]  Seyed Foad Ebrahimi,et al.  Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Economics: Functional Analysis of the Grammatical Subject , 2015 .

[18]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[19]  Angela Tadros.  Prediction in text , 1985 .

[20]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells : from corpus to cognition , 2000 .

[21]  F. Jiang.  Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change , 2016 .

[22]  R. Ivanič.  NOUNS IN SEARCH OF A CONTEXT: A STUDY OF NOUNS WITH BOTH OPEN- AND CLOSED-SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS , 1991 .

[23]  N. Tahara,et al.  Metadiscursive Nouns and Textual Cohesion in Second Language Writing , 2014 .

[24]  Phuong Dzung Pho,et al.  Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance , 2008 .

[25]  Joan Cutting,et al.  Vague language in conference abstracts , 2012 .

[26]  Minna Vihla.  Medical Writing: Modality in Focus , 1999 .

[27]  K. Hyland,et al.  Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing , 2005 .

[28]  M. Bondi.  Changing voices: authorial voice in abstracts , 2014 .

[29]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts , 2005 .

[30]  Rosa Lorés.  On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation ☆ , 2004 .

[31]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse , 2012 .

[32]  Hilkka Stotesbury,et al.  Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences , 2003 .

[33]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .