Towards an Activity-Driven Design Method for Online Learning Resources

In this chapter we focus on the challenges we have encountered in the development of an activity-driven design method for online resources in an education programme for school leaders. The study is part of a follow-up research of the Digital Leadership Project (DLP) at the University of Oslo. The design method is experimental and grounded in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT). The study can be seen as a contribution within CHAT in terms of moving from the current use of CHAT as simply a descriptive evaluation tool between analysis and design or design and redesign towards a more developmental model. The study addresses the research problem of interrupting an existing education course design with new technologies and learning objects/resources to try to bridge the gap between different designs for learning. This research contributes to the understanding of how the interplay between cultural artefacts, such as pedagogical ideas, design methods, and technological solutions in a design activity can influence solutions and lead to tensions, which create opportunities for the transformation of the design as a whole.

[1]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Authentic assessment of teaching in context , 2000 .

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[3]  Trond Eiliv Hauge,et al.  VideoPaper as a Bridging Tool in Teacher Professional Development , 2010 .

[4]  Nora H. Sabelli,et al.  Complex Systems and Educational Change: Towards a new research agenda , 2008 .

[5]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing System Dualities: Characterizing a Web-Supported Professional Development Community , 2003 .

[6]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[7]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice , 2002 .

[8]  S. Barab,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Conceptualize Online Community and Using Online Community to Conceptualize Activity Theory , 2004 .

[9]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Putting Vygotsky to Work: The Change Laboratory as an Application of Double Stimulation , 2007 .

[10]  Trond Eiliv Hauge,et al.  Lærerrollen i prosjektarbeid: Kunnskapsutvikling gjennom bruk av en multimedial læringsressurs , 2006 .

[11]  Harald Rorvik,et al.  Didactical Thinking and Research in Norway during the Four Last Decades , 1997 .

[12]  Tomaz Amon,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Learner Activities with New Technologies: Guidelines for the Lab@Future Project , 2009 .

[13]  Trond Eiliv Hauge.  Portfolios and ICT as Means of Professional Learning in Teacher Education , 2006 .

[14]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: what we know and what we need to know , 2001 .

[15]  James Dalziel,et al.  Implementing learning design : the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) , 2003 .

[16]  Wim Jochems,et al.  Integrated E-Learning: Implications for Pedagogy, Technology and Organization , 2004 .

[17]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Using activity-oriented design methods to study collaborative knowledge-building in e-learning courses within higher education , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[18]  K. Kuutti.  Perspectives on activity theory: Activity theory, transformation of work, and information systems design , 1999 .

[19]  Hans Christian Arnseth,et al.  Approaching institutional contexts: systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..