Direct atmosphere opacity observations from CALIPSO provide new constraints on cloud‐radiation interactions

The spaceborne lidar CALIPSO (Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation) directly measures atmospheric opacity. In 8 years of CALIPSO observations, we find that 69% of vertical profiles penetrate through the complete atmosphere. The remaining 31% do not reach the surface, due to opaque clouds. The global mean altitude of full attenuation of the lidar beam (z_opaque) is 3.2 km, but there are large regional variations in this altitude. Of relevance to cloud‐climate studies, the annual zonal mean longwave cloud radiative effect and annual zonal mean z_opaque weighted by opaque cloud cover are highly correlated (0.94). The annual zonal mean shortwave cloud radiative effect and annual zonal mean opaque cloud cover are also correlated (−0.95). The new diagnostics introduced here are implemented within a simulator framework to enable scale‐aware and definition‐aware evaluation of the LMDZ5B global climate model. The evaluation shows that the model overestimates opaque cloud cover (31% obs. versus 38% model) and z_opaque (3.2 km obs. versus 5.1 km model). In contrast, the model underestimates thin cloud cover (35% obs. versus 14% model). Further assessment shows that reasonable agreement between modeled and observed longwave cloud radiative effects results from compensating errors between insufficient warming by thin clouds and excessive warming due to overestimating both z_opaque and opaque cloud cover. This work shows the power of spaceborne lidar observations to directly constrain cloud‐radiation interactions in both observations and models.

[1]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Using in situ airborne measurements to evaluate three cloud phase products derived from CALIPSO , 2016 .

[2]  Brian E. Eaton,et al.  Evaluating and improving cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 using spaceborne lidar observations , 2016 .

[3]  J. Kay,et al.  Global Climate Impacts of Fixing the Southern Ocean Shortwave Radiation Bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) , 2015 .

[4]  Vincent Noel,et al.  Where and when will we observe cloud changes due to climate warming? , 2014 .

[5]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Contributions of Clouds, Surface Albedos, and Mixed-Phase Ice Nucleation Schemes to Arctic Radiation Biases in CAM5 , 2014 .

[6]  Tsuyoshi Koshiro,et al.  Origins of the Solar Radiation Biases over the Southern Ocean in CFMIP2 Models , 2014 .

[7]  G. Cesana,et al.  Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO‐GOCCP , 2013 .

[8]  S. Bony,et al.  LMDZ5B: the atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[9]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Comparison of Two Different Cloud Climatologies Derived from CALIOP-Attenuated Backscattered Measurements (Level 1): The CALIPSO-ST and the CALIPSO-GOCCP , 2013 .

[10]  D. Winker,et al.  On the nature and extent of optically thin marine low clouds , 2012 .

[11]  S. Bony,et al.  The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low‐cloud problem in CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[12]  G. Cesana,et al.  How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO‐GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[13]  H. Chepfer,et al.  A process oriented characterization of tropical oceanic clouds for climate model evaluation, based on a statistical analysis of daytime A-train observations , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[14]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators , 2012 .

[15]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[16]  R. Charlson,et al.  Quantification of Monthly Mean Regional-Scale Albedo of Marine Stratiform Clouds in Satellite Observations and GCMs , 2011 .

[17]  John M. Haynes,et al.  COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .

[18]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Properties of cirrus and subvisible cirrus from nighttime Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), related to atmospheric dynamics and water vapor , 2011 .

[19]  J. Kay,et al.  The Boundary Layer Response to Recent Arctic Sea Ice Loss and Implications for High-Latitude Climate Feedbacks , 2011 .

[20]  S. Bony,et al.  The GCM‐Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO‐GOCCP) , 2010 .

[21]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles , 2010 .

[22]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Global analysis of cloud phase and ice crystal orientation from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data using attenuated backscattering and depolarization ratio , 2010 .

[23]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[24]  David M. Winker,et al.  Fully Automated Detection of Cloud and Aerosol Layers in the CALIPSO Lidar Measurements , 2009 .

[25]  R. Marchand,et al.  A comparison of simulated cloud radar output from the multiscale modeling framework global climate model with CloudSat cloud radar observations , 2009 .

[26]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget , 2009 .

[27]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[28]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities , 2008 .

[29]  K. Taylor,et al.  Estimating shortwave radiative forcing and response in climate models , 2007 .

[30]  S. Bony,et al.  How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes , 2006 .

[31]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .