Anisotropic bone remodeling of a biomimetic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant.

Hip resurfacing (HR) is a highly attractive option for young and active patients. Some surgeons have advocated cementing the metaphyseal stem of the femoral component to improve fixation and survivorship of HR. However, extending component fixation to the metaphysis may promote femoral head strain shielding, which in turn may reduce survival of the femoral component. Replacing the metallic metaphyseal stem by a composite material with bone-matching properties could help to alleviate this phenomenon. This study uses finite element analysis to examine the strain state in the femoral head for three types of implant fixation: an unfixed metallic stem, an osseointegrated biomimetic stem and a cemented metallic stem. Bone remodeling is also simulated to evaluate long-term bone resorption due to strain shielding. Results show that the unfixed stem causes strain shielding in the femoral head, and that cementing the stem increases strain shielding. The biomimetic stem does not eliminate the strain shielding effect, but reduces it significantly versus the metallic cemented version. The current finite element study suggests that an osseointegrated metaphyseal stem made of biomimetic material in hip resurfacing implants could become an interesting alternative when fixation extension is desired.

[1]  M Viceconti,et al.  Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  S. Gupta,et al.  A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: Effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  S. Vowler,et al.  FEMORAL NECK RESORPTION AFTER HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY – A COMPARISON OF CEMENTED AND UNCEMENTED PROSTHESES , 2006 .

[5]  J. M. Garcı́a,et al.  Anisotropic bone remodelling model based on a continuum damage-repair theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. Campbell,et al.  The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  W. Liu,et al.  An intermediate loading rate technique for the determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  M. L. Le Duff,et al.  Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  M. L. Le Duff,et al.  Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing: When and Why , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Aurelian Vadean,et al.  Design of a biomimetic polymer-composite hip prosthesis. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  L. Yahia,et al.  Bone remodeling in a new biomimetic polymer-composite hip stem. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress changes in the femoral head due to porous ingrowth surface replacement arthroplasty. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Legoux,et al.  Tissue response to the components of a hydroxyapatite-coated composite femoral implant. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  M Doblaré,et al.  Application of an anisotropic bone-remodelling model based on a damage-repair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Risk Factors Affecting Outcome of Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  I. Learmonth,et al.  The practical limitations of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  L. Yahia,et al.  CF/PA12 composite femoral stems: Manufacturing and properties , 2008 .

[18]  S. Vowler,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[19]  I A J Radcliffe,et al.  Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  M. Tho Bone and joints modelling with individualized geometric and mechanical properties derived from medical image: application to the evaluation of osteoarticular pathology , 2003 .

[21]  J. Whitfield,et al.  Novel carbon fiber composite for hip replacement with improved in vitro and in vivo osseointegration. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  M. Lavigne,et al.  Évolution radiologique du col fémoral après resurfaçage de hanche , 2011 .

[23]  Maarten Moesen,et al.  A symmetry invariant formulation of the relationship between the elasticity tensor and the fabric tensor. , 1985, Mechanics of materials : an international journal.

[24]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  M Taylor,et al.  Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  J. Lonner National joint replacement registry. , 2009, American journal of orthopedics.

[28]  J. Yang,et al.  Mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement containing PMMA-SiO2 hybrid sol-gel material. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  F. Sidoroff,et al.  Damage Induced Elastic Anisotropy , 1982 .

[30]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip : Section I Symposium , 2004 .

[31]  L. Yahia,et al.  Performance of CF/PA12 composite femoral stems , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[32]  M. Doblaré,et al.  Development of an Internal Bone Remodelling Theory and Applications to Some Problems in Orthopaedic Biomechanics* , 2002 .

[33]  M. L. Le Duff,et al.  Resurfacing THA for Patients Younger Than 50 Years: Results of 2- to 9-year Followup , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  R. Meek,et al.  Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[35]  S M Kurtz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[36]  加畑 多文,et al.  Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty における血中金属イオン濃度の経時的変化 , 2007 .

[37]  J Bare,et al.  Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[38]  N. Nuño,et al.  Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  M. Tho Bone and Joints Modelling with Individualized Geometric and Mechanical Properties Derived from Medical Images , 2003 .

[40]  N. Nuño,et al.  Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.