The Activist Personality: Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Opposition Activism in Authoritarian Regimes

Why do people become opposition activists in authoritarian regimes where dissent invites social censure and can be dangerous? We make a new contribution to answering this classic question: personality. For the first time outside of democratic contexts, we investigate the association between personality traits and opposition activism, arguing that some traits work universally, while others interact with political context. We propose that—as in democracies—high extraversion predicts political activism, regardless of its pro- or anti-regime orientation, and, in particular, that extraversion is critical to explain the shift from online to offline action. We also argue that—contrary to democratic contexts—low agreeableness predicts opposition activism in autocracies, because it reduces the perceived costs of non-conformity. We test these arguments based on two independent survey samples from Russia, a stable authoritarian regime. In a series of statistical tests, including two case-control designs, we find consistent support for all hypotheses.

[1]  A. Semenov,et al.  Navalny’s Digital Dissidents: A New Dataset on a Russian Opposition Movement , 2021, Problems of Post-Communism.

[2]  Matthijs Rooduijn,et al.  The Populist Appeal: Personality and Antiestablishment Communication , 2020, The Journal of Politics.

[3]  Ching-Hsing Wang,et al.  Personality traits and the propensity to protest: a cross-national analysis , 2020 .

[4]  Jessica C. Teets,et al.  The innovative personality? Policy making and experimentation in an authoritarian bureaucracy , 2019, Public Administration and Development.

[5]  V. Mironova,et al.  Mobilizing civilians into high-risk forms of violent collective action , 2020, Journal of Peace Research.

[6]  C. Kandler,et al.  The Generalizability of Personality Effects in Politics , 2019, European Journal of Personality.

[7]  Graeme B. Robertson,et al.  Putin v. the People , 2019 .

[8]  M. Özer,et al.  Personality Traits, Migration Intentions, and Cultural Distance , 2018, Papers in Regional Science.

[9]  Yphtach Lelkes,et al.  Selling Ourselves Short? How Abbreviated Measures of Personality Change the Way We Think about Personality and Politics , 2018, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  V. Havel The Power of the Powerless , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[11]  David Ost The Sham, and the Damage, of “Living in Truth” , 2018 .

[12]  Henry Thomson Grievances, Mobilization, and Mass Opposition to Authoritarian Regimes: A Subnational Analysis of East Germany’s 1953 Abbreviated Revolution , 2018 .

[13]  Jan Matti Dollbaum Curbing protest through elite co-optation? Regional protest mobilization by the Russian systemic opposition during the ‘for fair elections’ protests 2011–2012 , 2017 .

[14]  Kathrin Ackermann Individual Differences and Political Contexts –The Role of Personality Traits and Direct Democracy in Explaining Political Protest , 2017 .

[15]  Graeme B. Robertson,et al.  Agreeable Authoritarians: Personality and Politics in Contemporary Russia , 2016, Comparative Political Studies.

[16]  Matthijs Rooduijn,et al.  The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany , 2016 .

[17]  Mikael Persson,et al.  Personality traits and party identification over time , 2015 .

[18]  O. Onuch EuroMaidan Protests in Ukraine: Social Media Versus Social Networks , 2015 .

[19]  C. DeYoung,et al.  Not as Different as We Want to Be: Attitudinally Consistent Trait Desirability Leads to Exaggerated Associations Between Personality and Sociopolitical Attitudes , 2016 .

[20]  K. Opp,et al.  Personality Traits (“Big Five”) and the Propensity to Political Protest: Alternative Models , 2014 .

[21]  Jeffery J. Mondak,et al.  Openness, extraversion and the intention to emigrate , 2013 .

[22]  Svend-Erik Skaaning,et al.  Autocracies, democracies, and the violation of civil liberties , 2013 .

[23]  Kerem Ozan Kalkan,et al.  Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models , 2013 .

[24]  C. Sibley,et al.  Personality and political orientation: Meta‐analysis and test of a threat‐constraint model. , 2012 .

[25]  Daniel L. Oberski,et al.  Personality and Political Participation: The Mediation Hypothesis , 2012 .

[26]  A. Furnham,et al.  The Development of a Short Measure of Character Strength , 2012 .

[27]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Predicting counterproductive work behavior from the interaction of personality traits , 2011 .

[28]  D. Treisman Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin , 2011 .

[29]  A. LeBas From Protest to Parties , 2011 .

[30]  M. Beissinger Mechanisms of Maidan: The Structure of Contingency in the Making of the Orange Revolution , 2011 .

[31]  Samuel Greengard,et al.  Censored! , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[32]  S. Gosling,et al.  The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind , 2008 .

[33]  B. Roberts,et al.  Personality Trait Change in Adulthood , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[34]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  M. Loveman High‐Risk Collective Action: Defending Human Rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  P. Vernon,et al.  Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[37]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  T. Kuran,et al.  Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989 , 1991, World Politics.

[39]  Doug McAdam Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.