The photophysics of green fluorescent protein: influence of the key amino acids at positions 65, 203, and 222.

The three amino acids S65, T203, and E222 crucially determine the photophysical behavior of wild-type green fluorescent protein. We investigate the impact of four point mutations at these positions and their respective combinations on green fluorescent protein's photophysics using absorption spectroscopy, as well as steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. Our results highlight the influence of the protein's hydrogen-bonding network on the equilibrium between the different chromophore states and on the efficiency of the excited-state proton transfer. The mutagenic approach allows us to separate different mechanisms responsible for fluorescence quenching, some of which were previously discussed theoretically. Our results will be useful for the development of new strategies for the generation of autofluorescent proteins with specific photophysical properties. One example presented here is a variant exhibiting uncommon blue fluorescence.

[1]  M. Michel-beyerle,et al.  Effects of Threonine 203 Replacements on Excited-State Dynamics and Fluorescence Properties of the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) , 2000 .

[2]  Fabio Beltram,et al.  The low frequency vibrational modes of green fluorescent proteins , 2003 .

[3]  Shaoyou Chu,et al.  Green fluorescent protein variants as ratiometric dual emission pH sensors. 1. Structural characterization and preliminary application. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[4]  S. J. Strickler,et al.  Relationship between Absorption Intensity and Fluorescence Lifetime of Molecules , 1962 .

[5]  Christian Seebacher,et al.  Mutagenic Stabilization of the Photocycle Intermediate of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[6]  Klaas J. Hellingwerf,et al.  Phototransformation of green fluorescent protein with UV and visible light leads to decarboxylation of glutamate 222 , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  S J Remington,et al.  Structural basis for dual excitation and photoisomerization of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Mark A Rizzo,et al.  An improved cyan fluorescent protein variant useful for FRET , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  George H. Patterson,et al.  A Photoactivatable GFP for Selective Photolabeling of Proteins and Cells , 2002, Science.

[10]  Ahmed A. Heikal,et al.  Multiphoton molecular spectroscopy and excited-state dynamics of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP): acid–base specificity ☆ , 2001 .

[11]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Green fluorescent protein (GFP): applications, structure, and related photophysical behavior. , 2002, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Alexander Wlodawer,et al.  The structural basis for spectral variations in green fluorescent protein , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  V. Subramaniam,et al.  One- and two-photon excited fluorescence lifetimes and anisotropy decays of green fluorescent proteins. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[14]  T. McAnaney,et al.  Green fluorescent protein variants as ratiometric dual emission pH sensors. 2. Excited-state dynamics. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[15]  Douglas C. Youvan,et al.  Time-resolved spectroscopy of wild-type and mutant Green Fluorescent Proteins reveals excited state deprotonation consistent with fluorophore-protein interactions , 1996 .

[16]  M. Lill,et al.  Proton shuttle in green fluorescent protein studied by dynamic simulations , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  W E Moerner,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy reveals fast optical excitation-driven intramolecular dynamics of yellow fluorescent proteins. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Tobias Meyer,et al.  Spatial dynamics of GFP-tagged proteins investigated by local fluorescence enhancement , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J. Tainer,et al.  Mechanism and energetics of green fluorescent protein chromophore synthesis revealed by trapped intermediate structures , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Michel-beyerle,et al.  Viscosity-Dependent Fluorescence Decay of the GFP Chromophore in Solution Due to Fast Internal Conversion , 2002 .

[21]  Peter J Tonge,et al.  Light-driven decarboxylation of wild-type green fluorescent protein. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Douglas C. Youvan,et al.  Dramatic reduction in fluorescence quantum yield in mutants of Green Fluorescent Protein due to fast internal conversion , 1998 .

[23]  S J Remington,et al.  Structural basis of spectral shifts in the yellow-emission variants of green fluorescent protein. , 1998, Structure.

[24]  M. Chalfie,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. , 1994, Science.

[25]  S J Remington,et al.  Structural and spectral response of green fluorescent protein variants to changes in pH. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[26]  Roger Y. Tsien,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Aequorea victoria Green Fluorescent Protein , 1996, Science.

[27]  J A McCammon,et al.  Shedding light on the dark and weakly fluorescent states of green fluorescent proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Hula-twisting in green fluorescent protein , 2004 .

[29]  G. Striker,et al.  Photochromicity and fluorescence lifetimes of green fluorescent protein , 1999 .

[30]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[31]  S. Boxer,et al.  Ultra-fast excited state dynamics in green fluorescent protein: multiple states and proton transfer. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T. Holak,et al.  Slow exchange in the chromophore of a green fluorescent protein variant. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  S. Meech,et al.  Internal Conversion in the Chromophore of the Green Fluorescent Protein: Temperature Dependence and Isoviscosity Analysis , 2003 .

[34]  R. Tsien,et al.  green fluorescent protein , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[35]  V. Subramaniam,et al.  Three photoconvertible forms of green fluorescent protein identified by spectral hole-burning , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  Mark Van der Auweraer,et al.  Excited-State Dynamics in the Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein Mutant Probed by Picosecond Time-Resolved Single Photon Counting Spectroscopy , 2001 .

[37]  R. S. Liu,et al.  The case of medium-dependent dual mechanisms for photoisomerization: one-bond-flip and hula-twist. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Robert Huber,et al.  Expansion of the genetic code enables design of a novel "gold" class of green fluorescent proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Vinod Subramaniam,et al.  Ultrafast dynamics in the excited state of green fluorescent protein (wt) studied by frequency-resolved femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy , 2002 .

[40]  B. Steipe,et al.  Stable Low-Temperature Photoproducts and Hole Burning of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) , 1999 .