Convolutional neural network‐based data anomaly detection method using multiple information for structural health monitoring

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is used worldwide for managing and maintaining civil infrastructures. SHM systems have produced huge amounts of data, but the effective monitoring, mining, and utilization of this data still need in‐depth study. SHM data generally includes multiple types of anomalies caused by sensor faults or system malfunctions that can disturb structural analysis and assessment. In the routine data pre‐processing, multiple signal processing techniques are required to detect the anomalies, respectively, which is inefficient. The large variations of extracted features from massive SHM data make the data anomaly detection techniques prone to be over‐processed or under‐processed. Even with expert intervention, the parameter tuning, associated with multiple data preprocessing methods, is still a challenge, making the procedure expensive and inefficient. In addition, one data anomaly detection technique frequently mis‐detects other types of anomaly. In this work, we focus on the anomaly detection in the stage of data pre‐processing that little work has been done based on the real‐world continuous SHM data with multiclass anomalies. We proposed a novel data anomaly detection method based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) that imitates human vision and decision making. First, we split raw time series data into sections, and visualized the data in time and frequency domain, respectively. Then each section's images were stacked as a single dual‐channel image and labeled according to graphical features (multi‐2D image space expression). Second, a CNN was designed and trained for data anomaly classification, during which the descriptions and representations of the anomalies' features were learned by convolution. To validate our work, we considered the effects of balanced and imbalanced training sets and training ratios on actual acceleration data from an SHM system for a long‐span cable‐stayed bridge. The results show that our method could detect the multipattern anomalies of SHM data efficiently with high accuracy. The proposed dual‐information CNN‐based design makes this detection process readily scalable, faster, and more accurate, thereby providing a novel perspective with strong potential for SHM data preprocessing.

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring , 2019 .

[2]  Mohammad R. Jahanshahi,et al.  Evaluation of deep learning approaches based on convolutional neural networks for corrosion detection , 2018 .

[3]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Continuous dynamic monitoring of a prestressed concrete bridge based on strain, inclination and crack measurements over a 14-year span , 2018 .

[4]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Autonomous Structural Visual Inspection Using Region‐Based Deep Learning for Detecting Multiple Damage Types , 2018, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[5]  Joo-Ho Choi,et al.  Gear fault diagnosis using transmission error and ensemble empirical mode decomposition , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[6]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  Wind turbine fault detection and classification by means of image texture analysis , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[7]  Xiaowei Luo,et al.  Transfer learning and deep convolutional neural networks for safety guardrail detection in 2D images , 2018 .

[8]  Xiaochun Luo,et al.  Recognizing Diverse Construction Activities in Site Images via Relevance Networks of Construction-Related Objects Detected by Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[9]  Kaige Zhang,et al.  Unified Approach to Pavement Crack and Sealed Crack Detection Using Preclassification Based on Transfer Learning , 2018, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[10]  Hyeran Byun,et al.  Detecting Construction Equipment Using a Region-Based Fully Convolutional Network and Transfer Learning , 2018, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[11]  Guowei Ma,et al.  Comparative Study of Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Hangingwall Stability , 2018, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[12]  Hui Li,et al.  Identification framework for cracks on a steel structure surface by a restricted Boltzmann machines algorithm based on consumer‐grade camera images , 2018 .

[13]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A deep hybrid learning model to detect unsafe behavior: Integrating convolution neural networks and long short-term memory , 2018 .

[14]  Li Deng,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in the Rising Wave of Deep Learning: The Historical Path and Future Outlook [Perspectives] , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  M. Sami Fadali,et al.  Active neural predictive control of seismically isolated structures , 2018 .

[16]  Yi-Zhou Lin,et al.  Structural Damage Detection with Automatic Feature‐Extraction through Deep Learning , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[17]  Yun-Lai Zhou,et al.  Structural damage detection using transmissibility together with hierarchical clustering analysis and similarity measure , 2017 .

[18]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of pit defects in an automobile engine cylinder cavity using the radial basis function neural network–genetic algorithm model , 2017 .

[19]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Damage detection under varying temperature using artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[20]  Yang Liu,et al.  Automated Pixel‐Level Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces Using a Deep‐Learning Network , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[21]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[22]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Robust data transmission and recovery of images by compressed sensing for structural health diagnosis , 2017 .

[23]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Modeling and harnessing sparse and low‐rank data structure: a new paradigm for structural dynamics, identification, damage detection, and health monitoring , 2017 .

[24]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems , 2016, DLRS.

[25]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Structural health monitoring: technological advances to practical implementations [scanning the issue] , 2016, Proc. IEEE.

[26]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Three-Tier Modular Structural Health Monitoring Framework Using Environmental and Operational Condition Clustering for Data Normalization: Validation on an Operational Wind Turbine System , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Heng-Tze Cheng,et al.  Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems , 2016, DLRS@RecSys.

[28]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Harnessing data structure for recovery of randomly missing structural vibration responses time history: Sparse representation versus low-rank structure , 2016 .

[29]  Jinping Ou,et al.  The state of the art in structural health monitoring of cable-stayed bridges , 2016 .

[30]  Kemal Kilic,et al.  An interactive machine-learning-based electronic fraud and abuse detection system in healthcare insurance , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[31]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2015, KDD.

[32]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[33]  Reinhold Huber-Mörk,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Steel Surface Defect Detection from Photometric Stereo Images , 2014, ISVC.

[34]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Data Compression of Structural Seismic Responses via Principled Independent Component Analysis , 2014 .

[35]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Blind denoising of structural vibration responses with outliers via principal component pursuit , 2013, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[36]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  Detection, identification, and quantification of sensor fault in a sensor network , 2013 .

[37]  K. Yuen,et al.  A novel probabilistic method for robust parametric identification and outlier detection , 2012 .

[38]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[39]  Sven Behnke,et al.  Evaluation of Pooling Operations in Convolutional Architectures for Object Recognition , 2010, ICANN.

[40]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Convolutional networks and applications in vision , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[41]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  Sensor validation using minimum mean square error estimation , 2010 .

[42]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: Theory and experimental verifications , 2009 .

[43]  Yann LeCun,et al.  What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition? , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[44]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Correcting Sensor Drift and Intermittency Faults With Data Fusion and Automated Learning , 2008, IEEE Systems Journal.

[45]  Marc'Aurelio Ranzato,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object Recognition , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[46]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[47]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Sensor validation using principal component analysis , 2005 .

[48]  Dean Pomerleau,et al.  Efficient Training of Artificial Neural Networks for Autonomous Navigation , 1991, Neural Computation.

[49]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[50]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[51]  Xiaochun Luo,et al.  Detecting non-hardhat-use by a deep learning method from far-field surveillance videos , 2018 .

[52]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.