Regional contribution to variability and trends of global gross primary productivity

Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) is the largest component of the global carbon cycle and a key process for understanding land ecosystems dynamics. In this study, we used GPP estimates from a combination of eight global biome models participating in the Inter-Sectoral Impact-Model Intercomparison Project phase 2a (ISIMIP2a), the Moderate Resolution Spectroradiometer (MODIS) GPP product, and a data-driven product (Model Tree Ensemble, MTE) to study the spatiotemporal variability of GPP at the regional and global levels. We found the 2000–2010 total global GPP estimated from the model ensemble to be 117 ± 13 Pg C yr−1 (mean ± 1 standard deviation), which was higher than MODIS (112 Pg C yr−1), and close to the MTE (120 Pg C yr−1). The spatial patterns of MODIS, MTE and ISIMIP2a GPP generally agree well, but their temporal trends are different, and the seasonality and inter-annual variability of GPP at the regional and global levels are not completely consistent. For the model ensemble, Tropical Latin America contributes the most to global GPP, Asian regions contribute the most to the global GPP trend, the Northern Hemisphere regions dominate the global GPP seasonal variations, and Oceania is likely the largest contributor to inter-annual variability of global GPP. However, we observed large uncertainties across the eight ISIMIP2a models, which are probably due to the differences in the formulation of underlying photosynthetic processes. The results of this study are useful in understanding the contributions of different regions to global GPP and its spatiotemporal variability, how the model- and observational-based GPP estimates differ from each other in time and space, and the relative strength of the eight models. Our results also highlight the models' ability to capture the seasonality of GPP that are essential for understanding the inter-annual and seasonal variability of GPP as a major component of the carbon cycle.

[1]  W. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. , 2006 .

[2]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[3]  Alfredo R. Huete,et al.  Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests , 2016, Science.

[4]  T. Jonathan Davies,et al.  Predicting phenology by integrating ecology, evolution and climate science , 2011 .

[5]  W. Post,et al.  The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design , 2013 .

[6]  W. Yuan,et al.  Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Q. Zhuang,et al.  Evaluating aerosol direct radiative effects on global terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics from 2003 to 2010 , 2014 .

[8]  A. Huete,et al.  Amazon Forests Green-Up During 2005 Drought , 2007, Science.

[9]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[10]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[11]  James W. Hurrell,et al.  Quality of Reanalyses in the Tropics , 2001 .

[12]  Mekonnen Gebremichael,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) in tropical monsoon regions , 2006 .

[13]  I. Prentice,et al.  Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling , 2014 .

[14]  Ben Bond-Lamberty,et al.  Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record , 2010, Nature.

[15]  S. Bruin,et al.  Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short‐term trends to longer‐term change , 2012 .

[16]  X. Zeng,et al.  Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data‐model intercomparison , 2017, Global change biology.

[17]  P. Blanken,et al.  Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  David J. Harding,et al.  Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season , 2014, Nature.

[19]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Dry-season greening of Amazon forests , 2016, Nature.

[20]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS gross primary productivity for Africa using eddy covariance data , 2013 .

[21]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models , 2017 .

[22]  Zhiyun Ouyang,et al.  Complex Spatiotemporal Responses of Global Terrestrial Primary Production to Climate Change and Increasing Atmospheric CO2 in the 21st Century , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  Min Chen,et al.  A new seasonal‐deciduous spring phenology submodel in the Community Land Model 4.5: impacts on carbon and water cycling under future climate scenarios , 2016, Global change biology.

[24]  F. Piontek,et al.  The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI–MIP): Project framework , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  H. Tian,et al.  Interactive comment on “ Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of North America during 1979 – 2008 : application of a global biogeochemistry model ” by H , 2022 .

[26]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2016 , 2016 .

[27]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[28]  Youngryel Ryu,et al.  Multi-scale evaluation of global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration products derived from Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS) , 2016 .

[29]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009 , 2010, Science.

[30]  N. Coops,et al.  Predicting tree diversity across the United States as a function of modeled gross primary production. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[32]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Seasonal carbon dynamics and water fluxes in an Amazon rainforest , 2012 .

[33]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A few extreme events dominate global interannual variability in gross primary production , 2014 .

[34]  P. Ciais,et al.  Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade , 2014, Nature.

[35]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[36]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Monitoring biosphere vegetation 1998–2009 , 2010 .

[37]  N. Gobron,et al.  Diagnostic assessment of European gross primary production , 2008 .

[38]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades , 2007 .

[39]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations , 2011 .

[40]  E. Davidson,et al.  Using model‐data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling , 2012 .

[41]  Jesse W. Campbell,et al.  Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production , 2017, Nature.

[42]  M. Scholze,et al.  Atmospheric constraints on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem productivity: Results from a carbon‐cycle data assimilation system , 2012 .

[43]  Y. Xue,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis , 2012 .

[44]  Martin Wahlen,et al.  Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño , 2011, Nature.

[45]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles , 2014 .

[46]  K. Davis,et al.  Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2010 .

[47]  Motoko Inatomi,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency of the Terrestrial Biosphere: A Model Analysis Focusing on Interactions between the Global Carbon and Water Cycles , 2012 .

[48]  H. Tian,et al.  North American terrestrial CO2 uptake largely offset by CH4 and N2O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget , 2014, Climatic Change.

[49]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Forest productivity and water stress in Amazonia: observations from GOSAT chlorophyll fluorescence , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  P. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2013 .

[51]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[52]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[53]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2012 .

[54]  Yu Xia,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS Gross Primary Production across Multiple Biomes in China Using Eddy Covariance Flux Data , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[55]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[56]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink , 2015, Science.

[57]  P. Ciais,et al.  Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review , 2015 .

[58]  Rashid Rafique,et al.  An algorithmic calibration approach to identify globally optimal parameters for constraining the DayCent model , 2015 .

[59]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system , 2013 .

[60]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network , 1994 .

[61]  S. Saleska,et al.  The phenology of leaf quality and its within‐canopy variation is essential for accurate modeling of photosynthesis in tropical evergreen forests , 2017, Global change biology.

[62]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[63]  Haifeng Qian,et al.  Impact of 1998–2002 midlatitude drought and warming on terrestrial ecosystem and the global carbon cycle , 2005 .

[64]  David Cook,et al.  Quantification of terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the conterminous United States combining a process-based biogeochemical model and MODIS and AmeriFlux data , 2011 .

[65]  P. Ciais,et al.  Biogeosciences The African contribution to the global climate-carbon cycle feedback of the 21 st century , 2008 .

[66]  Belinda E. Medlyn,et al.  Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO2 fertilization on net primary productivity , 2016 .

[67]  Wenjie Dong,et al.  Gross primary production of global forest ecosystems has been overestimated , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[68]  The African contribution to the global climate-carbon cycle feedback of the 21st century , 2008 .

[69]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[70]  Mohamed Ouberdous,et al.  Responses of European forest ecosystems to 21st century climate: assessing changes in interannual variability and fire intensity , 2011 .