Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue

As the light vehicle fleet moves to electric drive (hybrid, battery, and fuel cell vehicles), an opportunity opens for “vehicle-to-grid” (V2G) power. This article defines the three vehicle types that can produce V2G power, and the power markets they can sell into. V2G only makes sense if the vehicle and power market are matched. For example, V2G appears to be unsuitable for baseload power—the constant round-theclock electricity supply—because baseload power can be provided more cheaply by large generators, as it is today. Rather, V2G’s greatest near-term promise is for quick-response, high-value electric services. These quick-response electric services are purchased to balance constant fluctuations in load and to adapt to unexpected equipment failures; they account for 5–10% of electric cost—$ 12 billion per year in the US. This article develops equations to calculate the capacity for grid power from three types of electric drive vehicles. These equations are applied to evaluate revenue and costs for these vehicles to supply electricity to three electric markets (peak power, spinning reserves, and regulation). The results suggest that the engineering rationale and economic motivation for V2G power are compelling. The societal advantages of developing V2G include an additional revenue stream for cleaner vehicles, increased stability and reliability of the electric grid, lower electric system costs, and eventually, inexpensive storage and backup for renewable electricity. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Alec N. Brooks,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid demonstration project: grid regulation ancillary service with a battery electric vehicle. , 2002 .

[2]  Willett Kempton,et al.  ELECTRIC VEHICLES AS A NEW POWER SOURCE FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES , 1997 .

[3]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy , 2005 .

[4]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW TO THE HYDROGEN ENERGY TRANSITION: MOVING TOWARD THE POST PETROLEUM AGE IN TRANSPORTATION , 2004 .

[5]  Paul L. Joskow Remedying Undue Discrimination through Open Access Transmission Service and Standard Electricity Market Design , 2003 .

[6]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Fuel cell system economics: comparing the costs of generating power with stationary and motor vehicle PEM fuel cell systems , 2004 .

[7]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support , 2007 .

[8]  D. Sperling,et al.  Demand for Electric Vehicles in Hybrid Households: An Exploratory Analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-Grid Power: Battery, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles as Resources for Distributed Electric Power in California , 2001 .

[10]  Alec Brooks,et al.  Integration of Electric Drive Vehicles with the Electric Power Grid -- a New Value Stream , 2001 .

[11]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Electric-drive vehicles for peak power in Japan , 2000 .

[12]  E. Hirst,et al.  Ancillary-service details: operating reserves , 1997 .

[13]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development , 1999 .

[14]  H. E. Strate NATIONWIDE PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY , 1972 .